The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)
statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently …
statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently …
[HTML][HTML] Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
D Moher, L Shamseer, M Clarke, D Ghersi, A Liberati… - Systematic reviews, 2015 - Springer
Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and
planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well …
planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well …
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
L Shamseer, D Moher, M Clarke, D Ghersi, A Liberati… - Bmj, 2015 - bmj.com
Protocols of systematic reviews and meta-analyses allow for planning and documentation of
review methods, act as a guard against arbitrary decision making during review conduct …
review methods, act as a guard against arbitrary decision making during review conduct …
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow
users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings. The Preferred …
users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings. The Preferred …
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Assessment of risk of bias is regarded as an essential component of a systematic review on
the effects of an intervention. The most commonly used tool for randomised trials is the …
the effects of an intervention. The most commonly used tool for randomised trials is the …
[HTML][HTML] Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis
JF Tierney, LA Stewart, D Ghersi, S Burdett, MR Sydes - Trials, 2007 - Springer
Background In systematic reviews and meta-analyses, time-to-event outcomes are most
appropriately analysed using hazard ratios (HRs). In the absence of individual patient data …
appropriately analysed using hazard ratios (HRs). In the absence of individual patient data …
Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD statement
Importance Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of individual participant data (IPD) aim to
collect, check, and reanalyze individual-level data from all studies addressing a particular …
collect, check, and reanalyze individual-level data from all studies addressing a particular …
Antiplatelet agents for prevention of pre-eclampsia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data
LM Askie, L Duley, DJ Henderson-Smart, LA Stewart - The Lancet, 2007 - thelancet.com
Background Pre-eclampsia is a major cause of mortality and morbidity during pregnancy
and childbirth. Antiplatelet agents, especially low-dose aspirin, might prevent or delay pre …
and childbirth. Antiplatelet agents, especially low-dose aspirin, might prevent or delay pre …
Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference?
LA Stewart, MKB Parmar - The Lancet, 1993 - Elsevier
The use of meta-analyses or overviews to combine formally the results of related
randomised clinical trials is becoming increasingly common. However the distinction …
randomised clinical trials is becoming increasingly common. However the distinction …
To IPD or not to IPD? Advantages and disadvantages of systematic reviews using individual patient data
LA Stewart, JF Tierney - Evaluation & the health professions, 2002 - journals.sagepub.com
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses that obtain original research data on individual
participants enrolled in trials have been described as the gold standard of review. However …
participants enrolled in trials have been described as the gold standard of review. However …