The ineffectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy in lymphocytic myocarditis: an overview

Ann Intern Med. 1998 Aug 15;129(4):317-22. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-129-4-199808150-00009.

Abstract

Background: The use of immunosuppressive therapy for myocarditis is controversial.

Purpose: To review the literature on the effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy in biopsy-proven lymphocytic myocarditis.

Data sources: Two authors independently searched MEDLINE and other medical databases from 1980 to 26 June 1997.

Study selection: Randomized, controlled trials; matched-cohort studies; and case-control studies of patients with biopsy-proven myocarditis (Dallas criteria or a mean of > or = 2.5 lymphocytes per high-power field) for which any form of immunosuppressive treatment was used. The outcomes of interest were mortality and change in left ventricular ejection fraction.

Data extraction: 6 of 374 studies satisfied the selection criteria.

Data synthesis: In survivors, left ventricular function in myocarditis improved approximately 10% over 6 months without immunosuppressive treatment. Prednisone alone did not improve survival (P >0.2) or left ventricular function (P >0.11). Prednisone combined with azathioprine or cyclosporine did not improve survival (P >0.2) or left ventricular function (P >0.2) in three studies. However, one small matched-cohort study showed improvement in children (P <0.01). Neither interferon nor thymic hormone improved survival or left ventricular function.

Conclusions: Immunosuppressive therapy is ineffective in lymphocytic myocarditis. Current therapy in lymphocytic myocarditis seems to be limited to supportive measures or transplantation.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Humans
  • Immunosuppression Therapy
  • Immunosuppressive Agents / therapeutic use
  • Lymphocytosis
  • Myocarditis / immunology
  • Myocarditis / mortality
  • Myocarditis / therapy*
  • Survival Rate

Substances

  • Immunosuppressive Agents