Authorship: the coin of the realm, the source of complaints

JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):216-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.216.

Abstract

Context: Disputes associated with achieving recognition for work done may affect both morale and subsequent resource allocation to medical researchers.

Objective: To assess authorship disputes brought to the Ombuds Office.

Setting: The Ombuds Office, Harvard Medical School, Dental School, School of Public Health, and affiliated hospitals.

Main outcome measure: Change in number of queries related to authorship between 1991 to 1992 and 1996 to 1997.

Results: Disputes increased from 8 (2.3%) of 355 issues brought to the office in 1991 to 1992 to 59 (10.7%) of 551 issues in 1996 to 1997. They also increased from involving 0.06% of the total population of faculty, staff, and students affiliated with the schools in 1991 to 1992 to 0.33% of the total population in 1996 to 1997. Such problems appear to occur more often for women (53% of complaints in 1994-1995 through 1996-1997) and for non-US citizens (21 % of complaints in 1991-1992 through 1996-1997).

Conclusions: Authorship disputes are increasingly frequent. Institutions should increase enforcement of published authorship standards and place more emphasis on managerial skills for laboratory and research department heads.

MeSH terms

  • Authorship*
  • Publishing