SPECIAL COMMUNICATION
National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Diagnosis and Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200002000-00018Get rights and content

ABSTRACT

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a commonly diagnosed behavioral disorder of childhood that represents a costly major public health problem. Despite progress, ADHD and its treatment have remained controversial, especially the use of psychostimulants for both short- and long-term treatment. Although an independent diagnostic test for ADHD does not exist, there is evidence supporting the validity of the disorder. Studies (primarily short-term, approximately 3 months), including randomized clinical trials, have established the efficacy of stimulants and psychosocial treatments for alleviating the symptoms of ADHD and associated aggressiveness and have indicated that stimulants are more effective than psychosocial therapies in treating these symptoms. Because of the lack of consistent improvement beyond the core symptoms and the paucity of long-term studies (beyond 14 months), there is a need for longer-term studies with drugs and behavioral modalities and their combination. Although trials are under way, conclusive recommendations concerning treatment for the long term cannot be made at present. There are wide variations in the use of psychostimulants across communities and physicians, suggesting no consensus regarding which ADHD patients should be treated with psychostimulants, and thus the need for improved assessment, treatment, and follow-up. Furthermore, the lack of insurance coverage, preventing the appropriate diagnosis and treatment of ADHD, and the lack of integration with educational services are substantial barriers and represent considerable long-term costs for society. Finally, after years of clinical research and experience with ADHD, knowledge about the cause or causes of ADHD remain largely speculative. Consequently, there are no documented strategies for the prevention of ADHD.

Section snippets

What Is the Scientific Evidence to Support ADHD as a Disorder?

The diagnosis of ADHD can be made reliably using well-tested diagnostic interview methods. However, as of yet, there is no independent valid test for ADHD. Although research has suggested a central nervous system basis for ADHD, further research is necessary to firmly establish ADHD as a brain disorder. This is not unique to ADHD, but applies as well to most psychiatric disorders, including disabling diseases such as schizophrenia. Evidence supporting the validity of ADHD includes the long-term

SUPPORTING LITERATURE

The speakers listed above identified the following key references in developing their presentations for the consensus conference. A more complete bibliography prepared by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) at the NIH, along with the references below, was provided to the consensus panel for their consideration. The full NLM bibliography is available at the following Web site: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/cbm/adhd.html

References (0)

Cited by (274)

  • Opposite Control of Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapse Formation by Slitrk2 and Slitrk5 on Dopamine Neurons Modulates Hyperactivity Behavior

    2020, Cell Reports
    Citation Excerpt :

    Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is characterized by symptoms of inattention and/or hyperactivity/impulsivity that interfere with the functioning or development of the brain (NIH, 2000).

  • Neurocognitive effects of methylphenidate in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analysis

    2018, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
    Citation Excerpt :

    Use of stimulants is increasing rapidly among adults, with 53% more adults using stimulants in 2012 than in 2008 (Express Scripts, 2014). The most researched of these medications is methylphenidate (MPH) (National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement, 2000). MPH increases the amount of dopamine and norepinephrine that are available in the synapse by blocking reuptake (Krause et al., 2003; Pietrzak et al., 2006).

View all citing articles on Scopus

This conference was held November 16-18, 1998.

NIH Consensus Statements are prepared by a nonadvocate, non-Federal panel of experts, based on (1) presentations by investigators working in areas relevant to the consensus questions during a 2-day public session; (2) questions and statements from conference attendees during open discussion periods that are part of the public session; and (3) closed deliberations by the panel during the remainder of the second day and morning of the third. This statement is an independent report of the panel and is not a policy statement of the NIH or the Federal Government.

NIH Consensus Development Panel members' names and affiliations are listed at the end of the text. Planning Committee members' names may be found at the following Web site: http://odp.od.nih.gov/consensus/cons/110/110_intro.htm.

Correspondence to John H. Ferguson, M.D., National Institutes of Health, 31 Center Drive, MSC-2082, Bethesda, MD 20892.

View full text