ReviewThe use of CPR feedback/prompt devices during training and CPR performance: A systematic review☆
Section snippets
Background
Survival from cardiac arrest remains poor1, 2 despite significant advances in the science of resuscitation over the last decade.3, 4 One explanation for advances in science not achieving their full therapeutic potential may be a failure to optimally implement evidence based guidelines into practice.5, 6 A number of studies have shown that the quality of CPR during training and in clinical practice is often sub-optimal, with inadequate compression depth, interruptions in chest compression,
Methods
The review was conducted in accordance with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) 2010 evidence evaluation process. Expert review of the search strategy and findings were conducted by the worksheet evaluation experts.
Results
This search identified 509 papers. After the removal of duplicates, 350 titles were reviewed for relevance. From this 36 titles appeared relevant to the research question leading to detailed review of abstracts. Eight further articles were discarded at this phase leaving 28 articles for full review. From the review of reference lists and review articles a further 5 studies were identified. There are no published randomised controlled trials (LOE 1) in human cardiac arrests that address this
Discussion
This review has identified evidence that the use of CPR feedback/prompt systems, either in addition to or in place of instructor facilitated training, can improve basic CPR skill acquisition and retention (as tested without use of the device). Automated feedback may be less effective than instructor feedback for more complex skills (e.g. bag-valve-mask ventilation).23 The use of CPR feedback/prompt systems during CPR performance on manikins consistently improves the quality of CPR. The utility
Authors conclusion and recommendation
This review provides good evidence supporting the use of CPR feedback/prompt devices during CPR training as a strategy to improve CPR skill acquisition and retention. The evidence suggests that the use of CPR feedback/prompt devices in clinical practice as part of an overall strategy to improve the quality of CPR may be beneficial. Further studies are required to assess if the improvements in quality of CPR brought about by these devices translate into improvements in patient focused outcomes.
Disclaimer
This review includes information on resuscitation questions developed through the C2010 Consensus on Science and Treatment Recommendations process, managed by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (http://www.americanheart.org/ILCOR). The questions were developed by ILCOR Task Forces, using strict conflict of interest guidelines. In general, each question was assigned to two experts to complete a detailed structured review of the literature, and complete a detailed worksheet.
Conflict of interest
JY, JS—none. GDP has published on CPR feedback devices (Q-CPR, Resusci-Anne Skill meter; CPR-Ezy). DE published on CPR feedback devices and has received research support from AHA and AHRQ, as well as research support, speaking honoraria and consulting from Philips.
Acknowledgements for funding
GDP receives support from the Department of Health National Institute of Health Research (DH NIHR) Clinician Scientist Scheme. This review has been supported in part by the DH NIHR and Research for Patient Benefit Programme.
References (56)
- et al.
The chain of survival
Resuscitation
(2006) - et al.
Education in resuscitation
Resuscitation
(2003) - et al.
Haemodynamic effects of adrenaline (epinephrine) depend on chest compression quality during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pigs
Resuscitation
(2006) - et al.
Quality of CPR during advanced resuscitation training
Resuscitation
(2008) - et al.
The challenge of CPR quality: improvement in the real world
Resuscitation
(2008) - et al.
An evaluation of objective feedback in basic life support (BLS) training
Resuscitation
(2007) - et al.
Defibrillation-safety versus efficacy
Resuscitation
(2008) - et al.
An automated voice advisory manikin system for training in basic life support without an instructor. A novel approach to CPR training
Resuscitation
(2001) - et al.
CPR quality improvement during in-hospital cardiac arrest using a real-time audiovisual feedback system
Resuscitation
(2007) - et al.
Improved basic life support performance by ward nurses using the CAREvent Public Access Resuscitator (PAR) in a simulated setting
Resuscitation
(2005)
Improvement in timing and effectiveness of external cardiac compressions with a new non-invasive device: the CPR-Ezy
Resuscitation
The study of the effectiveness of chest compressions using the CPR-plus
Resuscitation
Retention of basic life support skills 6 months after training with an automated voice advisory manikin system without instructor involvement
Resuscitation
The voice advisory manikin (VAM): an innovative approach to pediatric lay provider basic life support skill education
Resuscitation
Voice advisory manikin versus instructor facilitated training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Resuscitation
Effectiveness of a 30-min CPR self-instruction program for lay responders: a controlled randomized study
Resuscitation
CPREzy improves performance of external chest compressions in simulated cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
The effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation instruction: animation versus dispatcher through a cellular phone
Resuscitation
Significant improvement of the quality of bystander first aid using an expert system with a mobile multimedia device
Resuscitation
Improving CPR performance using an audible feedback system suitable for incorporation into an automated external defibrillator
Resuscitation
The quality of chest compressions by trained personnel: the effect of feedback, via the CPREzy, in a randomized controlled trial using a manikin model
Resuscitation
Effects of audio tone guidance on performance of CPR in simulated cardiac arrest with an advanced airway
Resuscitation
CPREzy: an evaluation during simulated cardiac arrest on a hospital bed
Resuscitation
Utilization of a pressure-sensing monitor to improve in-flight chest compressions
Am J Emerg Med
Use of an automatic mechanical chest compression device (LUCAS) as a bridge to establishing cardiopulmonary bypass for a patient with hypothermic cardiac arrest
Resuscitation
Evaluation of M-AID®, a first aid application for mobile phones
Resuscitation
Twelve-month retention of CPR skills with automatic correcting verbal feedback
Resuscitation
Better adherence to the guidelines during cardiopulmonary resuscitation through the provision of audio-prompts
Resuscitation
Cited by (278)
Monitoring chest compressions using finger photoplethysmography in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
2023, Biomedical Signal Processing and ControlCardiopulmonary Resuscitation: The Importance of the Basics
2023, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North AmericaAugmented reality training in basic life support with the help of smart glasses. A pilot study
2023, Resuscitation Plus
- ☆
A Spanish translated version of the summary of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.04.012.