Elsevier

European Journal of Cancer

Volume 35, Issue 2, February 1999, Pages 248-255
European Journal of Cancer

Original Paper
Health-related quality of life in survivors of tumours of the central nervous system in childhood—a preference-based approach to measurement in a cross-sectional study1

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(98)00366-9Get rights and content

Abstract

There is an evident need to measure the comprehensive burden of morbidity experienced by survivors of brain tumours in childhood. To this end, a questionnaire based on the Health Utilities Index mark 2 (HUI2) and mark 3 (HUI3) systems was completed independently for a cohort of such children by their parents, by a nurse, by physicians and by a selected group of the children themselves. Each of the HUI2 and HUI3 systems consists of a multi-attribute health status classification scheme linked to a preference function which provides utility scores for levels within single attributes (domains of health) and for global health states. All eligible families (n=44) participated. Even cognitively impaired children of at least 9.5 years of age could complete the questionnaire. The greatest burden of morbidity, occurring in two-thirds of children, was in the attribute of cognition. Surprisingly, almost one-third of children experienced pain. Global health status was lowest in children who underwent radiotherapy before the age of 5 years and the corresponding utility scores were related inversely to the volume irradiated. Children with demonstrable disease had lower scores than those in whom disease was not evident. There was a high level of agreement (intraclass correlation coefficients >0.5) on formal assessment of inter-rater reliability for global health-related quality of life utility scores. The usefulness of measures of health status and health-related quality of life, in children surviving brain tumours, has been demonstrated by this study.

Introduction

Brain tumours are the commonest group of solid tumours in children in industrialised societies, and the incidence of these neoplasms is rising[1]. Furthermore, within some parts of the developing world, in which most children reside, there appears to be a serious problem of under-diagnosis[2]. As the prospects for long-term survival from neoplasms of the central nervous system continue to increase[1], at least for children in industrialised countries, there is growing recognition of the need to address the sequelae of these diseases and of their treatment[1]. The neuropsychological consequences of ‘successful’ therapy for brain tumours of childhood have been well summarised[3], but the comprehensive burden of morbidity that these survivors bear has been less well examined[4].

We have developed and applied instruments, based on Health Utilities Index systems (HUI)[5], for the measurement of morbidity burden. The HUI can capture multiple sequelae and describe varying levels of severity. A pilot study of a small case series of children surviving brain tumours has been reported[4]. The primary purpose of the present study was to investigate the comprehensive (global) health status of a larger group of such children, using a nurse as the primary assessor, and to use a preference-based approach to measurement in order to quantify their health-related quality of life (HRQL). Patrick and Erikson[6]defined HRQL as ‘the value assigned to the duration of life as modified by the impairments, functional states, precautions and social opportunities that are influenced by disease, injury, treatment or policy’. Secondary objectives were an assessment of the proportion of children surviving brain tumours who could complete, by self-report, a questionnaire on their health status; and an assessment of inter-rater agreement (reliability) in health status measurements.

This paper is paired with that of Glaser and colleagues[7]as these are complementary contributions and the repetition of descriptions about several components (such as the HUI classification systems) is thereby avoided. Furthermore, although there are some differences in the survey methods, the populations being sampled are very similar.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

All children who had completed therapy for tumours of the central nervous system, and who were attending the neuro-oncology follow-up clinic in the Children’s Hospital at Chedoke–McMaster (Hamilton, Ontario, Canada) during the interval February 1993 to February 1995, were eligible for the study. The sex, ages at diagnosis and time of study, and intervals from diagnosis and completion of therapy to time of study were recorded. Information was obtained on tumour histology, operative intervention,

Results

All eligible families (n=44) agreed to participate and did so during clinic attendance. The patients were divided equally between boys (n=22) and girls (n=22). The ages at diagnosis were <0.1–14.2 years, mean 6.2 years; and at the time of the study were 1.7–17.9 years, mean 9.5 years. The intervals from diagnosis to the time of the study ranged from 0.2 to 8.6 years, mean 3.3 years; and from completion of therapy to the time of the study ranged from <0.1 to 8.6 years, mean 2.6 years. The tumour

Discussion

A simple system for ranking the global health status of children surviving brain tumours was devised by Bloom and colleagues more than 25 years ago[26]. Despite its limitations, especially in the property of sensitivity[4], this approach has remained in use27, 28, 29. Not surprisingly, such systems seriously underestimate global and specific morbidity burdens4, 30. The need for a more comprehensive and detailed strategy for health status measurement in these children has been recognised for

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank our colleagues Patricia Case, Carol Hirst, Dr Robert Hollenberg, Dr Mohan Pai and Dr Andrew Willan for their contributions to this study which was supported financially by the Children’s Cancer and Leukemia Research Fund.

References (49)

  • Patrick DL, Erikson P. Health Status and Health Policy: Quality of Life in Health Care Evaluation and Resource...
  • Furlong W, Torrance GW, Feeny D. Health Utilities Index: algorithm for determining mark II/mark III health status...
  • W Furlong et al.

    Properties of health utilities index: preliminary evidence

    Qual Life Newsletter

    (1996)
  • Feeny DH, Torrance GW, Furlong WJ. Health Utilities Index. In Spilker B, ed. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in...
  • R.D Barr et al.

    Health-related quality of life during post-induction chemotherapy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission

    Int J Oncol

    (1997)
  • D Feeny et al.

    Multi-attribute approach to the assessment of health-related quality of life: Health Utilities Index

    Med Pediatr Oncol

    (1998)
  • G.W Torrance et al.

    Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index

    PharmacoEconomics

    (1995)
  • G.W Torrance et al.

    Multi-attribute preference functions for a comprehensive health status classification system: Health Utilities Index Mark II

    Med Care

    (1996)
  • Furlong WJ. Variability of utility scores for health states among general population groups. MSc thesis, McMaster...
  • P Dolan et al.

    The time trade off method: results from a general population study

    Health Econ

    (1993)
  • Gold MR, Patrick DL, Torrance GW, et al. Identifying and valuing outcomes. In Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein...
  • Norman GR, Streiner DL. Biostatistics. The Bare Essentials. St. Louis, Mosby Year Book,...
  • P Shrout et al.

    Intra-class correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability

    Psychol Bull

    (1979)
  • J Cohen

    Weighted Kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit

    Psychol Bull

    (1968)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Presented in part to the meetings of the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) in Paris, September 1994 and Montevideo, October 1995.

    View full text