Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 347, Issue 8998, 10 February 1996, Pages 367-369
The Lancet

Early reports
Undiagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus in the community

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90539-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Summary

Background Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) produces a wide range of symptoms, some of them mild; therefore it may be underdiagnosed. In a pilot study we tested the ability of a screening questionnaire to identify undiagnosed cases in the community.

Methods A 10-item questionnaire was mailed to 3500 women aged 18-65 randomly selected from a general practice list in Birmingham, UK. A random sample of 300 non-respondents were sent two further mailings. Women returning the questionnaire with three positive answers were to attend for an antinuclear antibody (ANA) test; and those testing positive were to be referred to a rheumatologist for standard clinical assessment.

Findings 1153 (30%) of the women responded, and 307 of these gave three or more positive answers on the questionnaire. The survey disclosed three women with previously undiagnosed SLE; and, in addition, it picked up all four of the women whose SLE had been diagnosed previously.

Interpretation The prevalence of SLE revealed by this survey in Birmingham women is 200/100 000 (95% confidence interval 80 to 412), whereas the prevalence of diagnosed SLE in this age group is 54/100 000 (95% Cl 47-62). Thus, a substantial number of undiagnosed cases exist, and further work needs to focus on the prevalence in different ethnic groups and the benefits of early diagnosis and treatment.

References (11)

  • R. Balarajan et al.

    Hospital care among ethnic minorities in Britain

    Health Trends

    (1991)
  • Ae Johnson et al.

    SLE disease activity among different ethnic groups in Birmingham, UK

    Br J Rheumatol

    (1993)
  • Pm McInnes et al.

    The economic impact of treatment of severe lupus nephritis with prednisolone and cyclophosphamide

    Arthritis Rheum

    (1994)
  • Mh Liang et al.

    A screening strategy for population studies in systemic lupus erythematosus: series design

    Arthritis Rheum

    (1980)
  • Mc Hochberg et al.

    Validity and yield of a two-stage screening procedure for systemic lupus erythematosus

    Clin Exp Rheumatol

    (1983)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (54)

  • Libman-Sacks endocarditis with an unusual presentation

    2010, Journal of the Saudi Heart Association
  • Understanding the Epidemiology and Progression of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

    2010, Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
    Citation Excerpt :

    Another issue with respect to studies that rely on the medical system to ascertain patients is the potential contribution of undiagnosed disease to the total burden within a population. A community survey in Birmingham (United Kingdom), combined with antinuclear antibody testing and clinical assessment of “positive” respondents, reported a prevalence of diagnosed SLE in women ages 18 to 65 years of 54 per 100,000; with the addition of the cases found during the screening, this estimate rose to 200 per 100,000 (41). A recent study from Olmstead County, Minnesota analyzed SLE incidence rates in 2 periods (6).

  • Epidemiology of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

    2007, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Companion to Rheumatology
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text