MINIMAL, PROGRESSIVE, AND FLUCTUATING HEARING LOSSES IN CHILDREN: Characteristics, Identification, and Management

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3955(05)70081-XGet rights and content

It has long been recognized that children with persistent moderate to profound hearing impairment of early onset experience a variety of communicative, academic, psychosocial, and emotional difficulties.7, 21, 25 Even some children with significant unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) (> 40 dB) exhibit problems in learning and difficulties with speech understanding in noisy situations.9 Also, significant costs are associated with early childhood hearing impairments. The estimated lifetime cost of childhood hearing loss exceeds $1 million for each affected child. Other less obvious costs include family tension, breakdowns in family communication, and social isolation.8, 20, 47

In contrast to the moderate to profound hearing losses, limited information exists on children with minimal, progressive, and fluctuating types of hearing impairments. In recent years, however, we have witnessed an increasing amount of published research on these rather unique populations of children. Because pediatricians are often the first to encounter children with hearing loss, it is important for them to develop some familiarity with the clinical characteristics of minimal, progressive, and fluctuating hearing losses in children. To this end, current clinical data on children with these types of hearing impairment are presented. For the purpose of this report, minimal hearing loss includes both conductive and sensorineural hearing losses; emphasis is placed on clinical characteristics, appropriate identification in pediatric practice settings, and recommended management.

Section snippets

MINIMAL CONDUCTIVE HEARING LOSS

Conductive hearing loss typically is characterized by air conduction thresholds through the mid-frequency range (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 kHz) of 25 to 30 dB hearing level (HL). Bone conduction values are relatively normal through this same frequency region producing an air-bone gap of approximately 25 dB HL. The degree of hearing loss varies and ranges from normal sensitivity to levels as great as 55 dB HL. Although many causes of conductive hearing loss in children exist, including middle ear anomalies

MINIMAL SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS

Since 1985, numerous clinical reports and essays have addressed the potential educational and psychosocial problems associated with minimal SNHL. Minimal SNHL typically refers to three different types of hearing impairment: unilateral SNHL, bilateral SNHL, and high-frequency SNHL. Unilateral SNHL is defined as an average air conduction threshold (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 kHz) of 20 dB HL or greater in the impaired ear, with an air-bone gap no greater than 10 dB at 1, 2, and 4 kHz. Average air conduction

FLUCTUATING AND PROGRESSIVE SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS

Hearing loss that fluctuates or progresses poses a unique challenge to a child's medical, audiologic, and educational management. One concern, particularly with younger children, is that professionals may assume that changes in audiometric results reflect attentional or behavioral factors as opposed to true changes in hearing sensitivity. By the authors' definition, a change in hearing sensitivity as reflected by an audiogram is an improvement or decrement in auditory threshold greater than 10

IDENTIFICATION AND MANAGEMENT

There is a dearth of information regarding the impact of progressive and fluctuating SNHL on children. It is certainly reasonable to assume that a change in hearing can be at most a frightening experience and at least a confusing one for a child. One could expect that family members can also be confused or misled by changes in a child's hearing. That is, during childhood, when behavioral boundaries are being explored, a parent may confuse a decline in hearing sensitivity with seemingly

SUMMARY

Referring to specific types of hearing loss as “minimal” or “mild” seems to imply that their effects are equally mild or negligible. A growing body of literature, however, supports the notion that such losses can have a significant impact on the communicative and educational development of young children. Although OME is considered a common childhood ailment, mounting evidence suggests that it is not always benign and may contribute to significant educational and communicative difficulties in

References (80)

  • F.H. Bess et al.

    Universal screening for infant hearing impairment: Not simple, not risk-free, not necessarily beneficial, and not presently justified

    Pediatrics

    (1994)
  • F.H. Bess et al.

    Unilateral hearing impairment in children

    Pediatrics

    (1984)
  • Bess FH, Dodd-Murphy J, Parker R: Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: Prevalence, educational performance...
  • J.C. Blair et al.

    The effects of mild sensorineural hearing loss on academic performance of young school-age children

    The Volta Review

    (1985)
  • P.E. Brookhouser et al.

    The pattern and stability of postmeningitic hearing loss in children

    Laryngoscope

    (1988)
  • P.E. Brookhouser et al.

    Unilateral hearing loss in children

    Laryngoscope

    (1991)
  • M.V. Caiaccio

    The Early Language Milestone Scale and the Sequenced Inventory of Communication Development: Comparison of Language Performance with Two Year Old Children

  • M.M. Cohen

    Genetics, syndromology, and craniofacial anomalies

  • J. Coplan et al.

    Validation of an early language milestone scale in a high-risk population

    Pediatrics

    (1982)
  • S.J. Crowe

    Ménière's disease: Study based on examinations made before and after intracranial division of vestibular nerve

    Medicine

    (1938)
  • A.J. Dahle et al.

    Progressive hearing impairment in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection

    J Speech Hear Dis

    (1979)
  • J.M. Davis

    Management of the school age child: A psychosocial perspective

  • J.M. Davis et al.

    Characteristics of hearing-impaired children in the public schools: Part II. Psychoeducational data

    J Speech Hear Dis

    (1981)
  • L.P. Dehner et al.

    Congenital syphilis: A reminder about the return of an old scourge

    Missouri Med

    (1994)
  • J.M. Dennis et al.

    Otoneurologic diseases and associated audiologic profiles

  • de VilliersP.A.

    Educational implications of deafness: Language and literacy

  • Feagans LV, McGhee S, Kipp E, et al: Attention to language in day-care attending children: A mediating factor in the...
  • GlasscockM.E.

    The stapes gusher

    Arch Otolaryngol

    (1973)
  • J.S. Gravel et al.

    Audiological management of otitis media

  • J.S. Gravel et al.

    Early otitis media, auditory abilities, and educational risk

    Am J Speech Language Pathol

    (1995)
  • K.M. Grundfast et al.

    Sudden or fluctuating hearing loss and vertigo in children due to perilymph fistula

    Ann Otol

    (1978)
  • H. Guiscafre et al.

    Reversible hearing loss after meningitis: Prospective assessment using auditory evoked responses

    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol

    (1984)
  • J.P. Harris et al.

    Inner ear autoantibodies in patients with rapidly progressive sensorineural hearing loss

    Laryngoscope

    (1990)
  • K.D. Hendricks-Munoz et al.

    Hearing loss in infants with persistent fetal circulation

    Pediatrics

    (1988)
  • V. Holm et al.

    Effects of chronic otitis media on language and speech development

    Pediatrics

    (1969)
  • G.B. Hughes et al.

    Clinical diagnosis of immune inner-ear disease

    Laryngoscope

    (1988)
  • G.B. Hughes et al.

    Practical versus theoretical management of autoimmune inner ear disease

    Laryngoscope

    (1984)
  • L.L. Hunter et al.

    High frequency hearing loss associated with otitis media

    Ear Hear

    (1996)
  • Cited by (49)

    • Impact of unilateral congenital aural atresia on academic Performance: A systematic review

      2018, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This systematic review emphasizes the need for future studies regarding this subject. According to the literature a significantly higher proportion of children demonstrate academic problems in case of (profound) unilateral SNHL compared with their normal-hearing peers [10–16]. In the 1980s and 1990s, 22–33% repeated at least one grade and 8–10% repeated two grades.

    • Epidemiology of cerumen impaction among municipal kindergartens children in Wuhan, China

      2017, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In contrast, studies from developing countries report prevalence rates in children from 7.4% to 63% [5–11]. Impacted cerumen is associated mainly with conductive hearing loss which is often insidious in nature and can be fluctuating, mild, unilateral or bilateral with deleterious effects on social, cognitive and academic development [12,13]. Epidemiological data of cerumen impaction in Chinese children are rare.

    • The validity of family history as a risk factor in pediatric hearing loss

      2015, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In postnatal cases, indeed, the proportion of conductive hearing loss was greatly higher than sensorineural hearing loss (only 13% SNHL/mixed). Such was expected and could be attributed to known OME peaks in childhood [30]. Although 87% of the children diagnosed with postnatal hearing loss were conductive cases, this could still be considered a worthy use of targeted surveillance resources.

    • A test protocol for assessing the hearing status of students with special needs

      2014, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Pure tone audiometry results showed that about 25% of students responded at levels higher than 40 dB HL in at least one test frequency. The prevalence of hearing loss for students enrolled in mainstream schools in Taiwan was 5.6%, 2.9%, 2.0%, and 1.6% for 1, 4, 7, and 10 graders, respectively [47], when hearing loss is defined as having pure tone averages at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz greater than 25 dB HL. The much higher failure rates obtained in this study are consistent with previous studies that individuals with special needs are more prone to have hearing disorders/loss than their normally developing peers [1–4,6,65–68].

    • The Hearing Scale Test for hearing screening of school-age children

      2010, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The reported prevalence rate of hearing impairment among children regardless of frequency or severity has varied from 1.5% to 14.9% [2,3]. The causes of unidentified hearing impairment in children include minimal sensorineural and fluctuating conductive hearing loss problems, with the most frequently found in school-age children being cerumen impaction, otitis media effusion, noise-induced hearing loss, unilateral hearing loss, and late-onset sensorineural hearing loss [4–7]. Early detection and identification of these hearing impairments is difficult, with routine hearing screening currently being the best choice [8,9].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Address reprint requests to, Anne Marie Tharpe, PhD, Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center, 1114 19th Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37212

    *

    Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center for Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee

    View full text