Original articlesInfants with “Colic”—mothers' perspectives on the crying problem
Introduction
Excessive crying behavior is one of the most common complaints brought to pediatricians in the first 3 months of life [1]. If an infant cries often, and if this crying is not explainable to the caregiver or if soothing efforts ordinarily fail, then parents often seek medical advice. If the pediatric examination of the infant does not reveal any organic cause of the crying, and if the infant is well-nourished and developed, the parental complaint will be labeled as “3-month colic” [2].
A widely accepted definition of colic (the criteria of Wessel [3]) includes a cutoff point on crying duration: it defines colic as fussing or crying lasting for more than 3 hours per day and occurring on more than 3 days in any 1 week for 3 weeks or longer.
The etiology of the phenomenon is not known and it is very doubtful that infantile “colic” with respect to cause is a homogeneous entity 2, 4, 5, 6. Furthermore, colic crying can hardly be differentiated qualitatively from “normal” crying [2]. The development of crying follows a universal course: beginning at about 2 weeks, the amount of crying increases. It peaks at around 6 weeks of age and thereafter declines continously until it reaches a basal level in the third month. Prolonged crying episodes tend to cluster in the late afternoon and evening hours 2, 7, 8, 9. Intra- and interindividual variability in crying behavior is high.
Wolke [10] differentiated three common but partially conflicting opinions on colic:
- 1.
Colic as the upper end of the normal crying distribution.
- 2.
Colic as a clinical syndrome.
- 3.
Colic as behavior that cannot be tolerated by the caregiver.
Until now, colic research has revealed only weak support for the second position 5, 11, whereas the first and third ones are compatible with models that center on the poorness of fit between parental and infant characteristics 12, 13, 14, 15. For example, Papous̆ek and Papous̆ek [12] hypothesized a disposition on the part of the infant; that is, a “difficult temperament” concerning heightened negative emotionality/irritability and poor soothability. On the part of the caregiver it depends on personal and psychosocial resources as to whether supporting interactional behavior can be shown, and thus compensate for the child's problems.
If this supporting parental behavior is lacking, excessive crying may become worse. Finally, in a vicious circle, serious impairment of the parent–infant relationship may result. Colic is therefore hypothesized to be a major risk for the infant's development 12, 16.
We can summarize as follows: infant colic is a frequent cause of parents consulting pediatricians. However, there is insufficient agreement on the definition of colic, and knowledge about the genesis of the problem as well as the long-term effects is deficient. It is probable that parental and infant characteristics in varying degrees and combinations are responsible for the development of the syndrome.
Demos [17] has pointed out that, on the part of the caregiver, his or her subjective perspective on the crying problem (i.e., causal attributions, cognitions, and emotional reactions) may play a very important role with regard to parental consulting behavior as well as developmental consequences of the problem. So far, not much attention has been devoted to studying these issues.
In this study, the mother–infant dyad with colic complaint is described with regard to the amount of crying behavior (using the Wessel criteria) and further aspects of early state organization. For this purpose, the “colic complaint group” will be compared to mother–infant pairs without a colic problem. Second, we address the question of whether—depending on the amount of infant crying behavior—specific causal attributions, thoughts, and feelings concerning infant crying can be found in the “colic complaint group” mothers. Finally, we investigate whether mothers—depending on the existence and degree of the colic problem and on their causal attributions, cognitions, and affective reactions to the crying—describe their infants as difficult in temperament at the age 4 months; that is, at a time when the colic problem has passed.
Section snippets
Subjects
The sample consisted of 40 mothers of 3–9-week-old infants. Twenty of these mothers brought their child to pediatric practices because of excessive crying, or indicated crying as a problem in public preventive screening (U3). Index group subjects were recruited from nine pediatric practices in the area of Gießen/Friedberg (western Germany), and control subjects were recruited from the same pediatric practices when they attended for preventive screening. To control for potential influences of
Description of the subgroups
The “colic complaint group” and the “control group” were matched carefully. After subdivision into the Wessel and non-Wessel colic groups (WC and NWC), there were still no statistically significant differences between the three groups in the control variables (see Table 1).
Significant group differences were found for the typical “colic” problem concerning soothing interventions: 66.6% (n = 6) of the mothers of NWC infants and 63.7% (n = 7) of WC infants, but only 15% (n = 3) of the control
Discussion
A primary aim of this study was a description of mother–infant pairs with colic complaints as compared to other mother–infant dyads with respect to infant crying behavior and several other characteristics of the infant's state organization. For this purpose, the “colic complaint” group was subdivided into two subgroups according to the Wessel criteria on crying duration.
Consistent with the findings presented by Barr et al. [5] in a comparable but larger sample of 38 colic infants and their
References (31)
Infant colic. A pediatric gastroenterologist's perspective
Pediatr Clin N Am
(1994)“Colic”—primary excessive crying as an infant–environment interaction
Pediatr Clin N Am
(1984)The treatment of problem crying behaviour
Recasting a clinical enigmathe case of infant crying
- et al.
Paroxysmal fussing in infancy, sometimes called “colic.”
Pediatrics
(1954) - et al.
The crying of infants with colica controlled empirical description
Pediatrics
(1990) - et al.
Trimenonkoliken als elterliche Klage in der pädiatrischen Praxis
Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie
(1997) - et al.
Infant crying patterns in Manali and London
Child Care Health Dev
(1994) The normal crying curvewhat do we really know?
Dev Med Child Neurol
(1990)- et al.
Crying in !Kung San infantsa test of the cultural specificity hypothesis
Dev Med Child Neurol
(1991)
Sleeping and feeding across the lifespan
Excessive infant crying and intuitive parental carebuffering support and its failures in parent–infant interaction
Early Child Dev Care
Crying and colic
Infant Mental Health J
The effectiveness of parent counseling in managing colic
Pediatrics
Cited by (48)
Experimental manipulation of emotion regulation changes mothers’ physiological and facial expressive responses to infant crying
2019, Infant Behavior and DevelopmentCitation Excerpt :For example, Austin et al. (2005) showed that maternal trait anxiety appears to represent a risk factor for reports of difficult infant temperament, independent of postnatal mood, possibly because trait anxiety has been associated with maladaptive emotion regulation (Dennis, 2007). In addition, Pauli-Pott, Becker, Mertesacker, and Beckmann (2000) showed that not all infants whose mothers consider crying a problem meet the criteria for excessive crying, but instead, their mothers show heightened negative affect and negative causal attributions of the crying. This finding indicates that it is important to consider mothers’ subjective experience of the crying and not only focus on the infant’s behavior.
Infant, maternal, and familial predictors and correlates of regulatory problems in early infancy: The differential role of infant temperament and maternal anxiety and depression
2017, Early Human DevelopmentCitation Excerpt :Moreover, an additional completion of structured diaries [56] would have been preferable, but high subject loss is often observed in diary studies [57]. Moreover, maternal anxiety and depression might affect maternal perception of regulatory problems [58–60] and maternal report of the latter may have been biased. However, maternal anxiety and depressive disorders were not equally predictive for all regulatory problems and maternal reports have been shown to be reliable and valuable [9,38].
Efficacy of chiropractic manual therapy on infant colic: A pragmatic single-blind, randomized controlled trial
2012, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological TherapeuticsCitation Excerpt :Infants with unexplained persistent crying (infant colic) presenting to a chiropractic teaching clinic at the Anglo-European College of Chiropractic were recruited between October 2007 and November 2009. The “mother's diagnosis” of colic24-26 was used to determine eligibility for the trial, verified by a baseline crying diary of 3 days or more. Other inclusion criteria were as follows: patients had to be younger than 8 weeks, born at a gestational age of 37 weeks or later, and had a birth weight of 2500 grams or more and show no signs of other conditions or illness.