Laparoscopic extramucosal pyloromyotomy versus open pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: Which is better?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(99)90212-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Background/Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the advantages or disadvantages of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy compared with open transumbilical fold pyloromyotomy.

Methods: Thirty consecutive laparoscopic extramucosal pyloromyotomies (LP) performed from 1994 to 1997 were compared with 30 consecutive open pyloromyotomies (OP) performed during the same period with regard to age at operation, body weight, thickness of hypertrophied pyloric muscle, operating time, time of return to full feeding, frequency of postoperative emesis, surgical complications, and degree of surgical stress reflected by interleukin-6 (IL-6). LP was performed according to conventional techniques, and OP was performed using a transumbilical fold approach.

Results: The groups were matched for age at operation, preoperative clinical and physical status, laboratory data, and size of the hypertrophied pylorus assessed by ultrasonography. There was a learning curve with LP; the average operating time required for the first 10 cases was significantly longer than the time required for OP, but later cases took just as long as OP cases. Time taken to full feeding was significantly shorter in the LP group than the OP group (LP, 38 hours v OP, 64 hours). One case was converted from LP to OP because of mucosal perforation. The incidence of postoperative emesis was significantly higher in the OP group than in the LP group (OP, 25% v LP, 3%). The mean length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in LP (P < .01). The intraoperative peak values of IL-6 in LP were significantly lower than those in the OP group (P < .01).

Conclusions: The advantages of LP are improved cosmesis, decreased surgical stress with earlier postoperative recovery, and shorter hospitalization. Because LP uses reusable devices, and the mean period of hospitalization is shorter, average operating costs could be reduced, representing a net saving in total hospital charges.

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (121)

  • Open Versus Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy for Pyloric Stenosis—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    2022, Journal of Surgical Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Of 410 abstracts, seven RCTs (eight reports) were used for final analyses9,19,26-30 (Fig. 1). Randomization was constrained in four trials26,28-30 and unrestricted in two trials,9,19 and minimization was used in one RCT.27 No RCT applied blinding for both participants and assessors, whereas in two RCTs, blinding of outcome assessment was applied.19,27

  • Congenital Anomalies and Surgical Disorders of the Stomach

    2020, Pediatric Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease, Sixth Edition
  • Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis

    2012, Pediatric Surgery, 2-Volume Set: Expert Consult - Online and Print
View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented at the 45th Annual International Congress of the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons, Bristol, England, July 21–24, 1998.

View full text