Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incorporating developmental screening and surveillance of young children in office practice

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Developmental concerns voiced by parents need to be responded to by structured developmental screening. Screening is the use of validated developmental screening tools to identify children with high risk of developmental delay out of an apparently normal population, while surveillance is the process of monitoring children identified as high risk by screening. Absence of routine screening can be attributed to problems at the level of parents, pediatricians or National policies. Hence vulnerable children are not detected early, and are denied benefit from appropriate developmental interventions. There are no definite guidelines for screening or for suitable tools for screening and surveillance.

Objectives

To review existing developmental screening and monitoring tools for children validated in Indian under-five children, and provide a proposed practice paradigm for developmental screening in office practice.

Evidence Acquisition

Scientific papers were retrieved by an electronic database search using MeSH terms ‘screening tool’, ‘developmental delay’, and filter of ‘children under 5 years’. Those relevant to office practice and validated internationally or in Indian children were reviewed.

Results

Screening tools applicable to Indian office practice have been compared and certain tools have been recommended according to the level of risk of developmental delay. An algorithmic approach to screening has been given along with strategies for incorporation.

Conclusions

Screening and surveillance for high risk of developmental delay are essential components of child health care. It is possible to incorporate both into routine practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grantham-Mc Gregor S, Cheung YB, Cueto S, Glewwe P, Richter L, Strupp B, et al. Child development in developing countries: Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries. Lancet. 2007;369:60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lynch TR, Wildman BG, Smucker WD. Parental disclosure of child psychosocial concerns: relationship to physician identification and management. J Fam Pract. 1997;44:273–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellman M, Byrne O, Sege R. Developmental assessment of children. BMJ: 2013:346;e8687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization, World Bank. World report on disability. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2011. Available from: URL:http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011. Accessed January 15, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Krishnamurthy V, Srinivasan R. In: Childhood Disability Screening Tools: The South East Asian Perspective. A Review for the WHO Office of the South East Asian Region. Mumbai. WHO, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dworkin PH. British and American recommendations for developmental monitoring: the role of surveillance. Pediatrics. 1989;84:1000–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Council on Children with Disabilities, Section on Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, Bright Futures Steering Committee, Medical Home Initiatives for Children with Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics. 2006;118:405–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ertem IO, Dogan DG, Gok CG, Kizilates SU, Caliskan C, Atay G, et al. A guide for monitoring child development in low- and middle-income countries. Pediatrics. 2008;121:e581–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Macias MM, Lipkin PH. Developmental surveillance and screening: refining principles, refining practice. How you can implement the AAP’s new policy statement. Contemp Pediatr. 2009;26:72–76.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hix-Small H, Marks K, Squires J, Nickel R. Impact of implementing developmental screening at 12 and 24 months in a pediatric practice. Pediatrics. 2007;120:381–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Radecki L, Sand-Loud N, O’Connor KG, Sharp S, Olson LM. Trends in the use of standardized tools for developmental screening in early childhood: 2002–2009. Pediatrics. 2011;128:214–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Desai PP, Mohite P. An exploratory study of early intervention in Gujrat State, India: Pediatricians’ perspectives. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2011;32:69–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Persons with Disabilities (equal opportunities, protection of rights and full participation) Act, 1995. Part II, section 1 of the Extraordinary Gazette of India, Ministry of Law, Justice and Company affairs (legislative department). Available from: URL: http://socialjustice.nic.in . Accessed December 27, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  14. National Rural health mission, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK) Child Health Screening and Early Intervention Services Under NRHM: Operational Guidelines. Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Robertson J, Hatton C, Emerson E. The identification of children with or at significant risk of intellectual disabilities in low and middle income countries: a review. CeDR Research Report. 2009:3

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fernald LCH, Kariger P, Engle P, Raikes A. Examining Early Child Development in Low Income countries: A Toolkit for the Assessment of Children in the First Five Years of Life. World Bank Human Development Group. 2009

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lansdown RG. Culturally appropriate measures for monitoring child development at family and community level: A WHO collaborative study. Bull World Health Organ. 1996;74:283 90.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Glascoe FP, Byrne KE, Ashford LG, Johnson KL, Chang B, Strickland B. Accuracy of Denver II in development screening. Pediatrics. 1992;89:1221–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Glascoe FP, Byrne KE. The accuracy of three developmental screening tests. JEI 1993; 17:268–379.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Frankenburg WK, Dodds J, Archer P, Shapiro H, Bresnick PB. Denver II: A major revision of re-standardization of Denver Developmental Screening Tool. Pediatrics 1992; 89:91–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Aylward GP. The Bayley Infant Neuro-developmental Screener. San Antonia, Tex: Psychological Corporation 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Macias MM, Saylor CF, Greer MK, Charles Jm, Bell N, Katikaneni LD. Infant screening: the usefulness of the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener and the Clinical Adaptive Test/Clinical Linguistic Auditory Milestone Scale. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1998;19:155–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bricker D, Squires J, Potter L. Revision of a parent completed screening tool: Ages and Stages Questionnaires. J Pediatr Psychol. 1997;32:313–28.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Juneja M, Mohanty M, Jain R, Ramji S. Ages and Stages Questionnaire as a screening tool for developmental delay in Indian children. Indian Pediatr. 2012;49:457–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Majnemer A, Rosenblatt B. Reliability of parental recall of developmental milestones. Pediatr Neurol. 1994;10:304–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Glascoe FP. Parents concerns about children’s development: pre-screening technique or screening test. Pediatrics. 1997;99:522–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pritchard MA, Colditz PB, Beller EM. Parents evaluation of developmental status in children with a birthweight of 1250 gm or less. J Paediatr Child Health. 2005;41:191–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Malhi P, Singhi P. Role of Parents Evaluation of Developmental Status in detecting developmental delay in young children. Indian Pediatr. 2002;39:271–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Alpern G, Boll T, Shearer M. Developmental Profile II (DP II). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services;1986.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Developmental Profile 3rd Ed. Revised and updated. An Accurate and an Efficient Means to Screen for Development delays. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services;2004.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Phatak AT, Khurana B. Barado Developmental Screening Test for infants. Indian Pediatr. 1991;28:31–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vazir S, Naidu AN, Vidyasagar P, Landsdown RG, Reddy V. Screening Test for Psychosocial development. Indian Pediatr. 1994;31:1465–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Malik M, Pradhan SK, Prasuna JG. Screening for psychosocial development among infants in an urban slum of Delhi. Indian J Pediatr. 2007;74:841–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nair MK, George B, Lakshmi S, Haran J, Sathy N. Trivandrum developmental screening Chart. Indian Pediatr. 1991;28:869–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gulati S, Aneja S, Juneja M, Mukherjee S, Deshmukh V, Silberberg D, et al. INCLEN diagnostic tool for neuromotor impairments (INDT-NMI) for primary care physicians: Development and validation. Indian Pediatr. 2014;51:613–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Silberberg D, Arora N, Bhutani V, Durkin M, Gulati S. Neuro-developmental disorders in India — An INCLEN study. Neurology. 2013;80:IN6–2.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Early Headstart National resource Centre. Developmental Screening, Assessment and Evaluation: Key Elements for Individualizing Curricula in Early Headstart Programs. Available from http://www.zerotothree.org . Accessed December 27, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Perrin E. Ethical questions about screening. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1998;19:350–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Glascoe FP. Screening for developmental and behavioral problems. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2005;11:173–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Department of Child and Adolescent Health Department, WHO. IMCI Care for Development. Available from: http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent health. Accessed November 19, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nair MKC, Russell PS, Rekha RS, Lakshmi MA, Latha S, Rajee K, et al. Validation of Developmental assessment Tool for Anganwadis (DATA). Indian Pediatr. 2009;46:S27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  42. D. Landis, J.M. Bennett, M.J. Bennett, editors. Handbook of Intercultural Training. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nair MKC. Early stimulation CDC Trivandrum Model. Indian J Pediatr. 1992;59:662–7.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nair MKC. Early Child Development — Kerala Model. Global Forum for Health research, Forum 3 Geneva: WHO 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  45. World Health Organization, UNICEF. Counsel the Family on Child Development-Counseling Cards. Available from: http://www.unicef.org/earlychildhood. Accessed December 27, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharmila B. Mukherjee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mukherjee, S.B., Aneja, S., Krishnamurthy, V. et al. Incorporating developmental screening and surveillance of young children in office practice. Indian Pediatr 51, 627–635 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-014-0465-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-014-0465-1

Keywords

Navigation