Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nature or Nurture: A Systematic Review of the Effect of Socio-economic Status on the Developmental and Cognitive Outcomes of Children Born Preterm

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of socio-economic status (SES) on the cognitive outcome of preterm-born children is unknown. The objectives of this study were to systematically review the published literature and to report the strength and consistency of the effect of SES on the cognitive outcomes of preterm children, across different SES indicators. We conducted a literature search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Social Science Citation Index to identify English-language cohort or case–control studies published after 1990 that had reported the effect of at least one SES indicator on cognitive outcome in children born <37 weeks gestation. Fifteen studies (from a total 4,162 identified) were included. Thirteen SES indicators were evaluated [categorized as: “individual-level” (6 indicators), “family-structure” (3), “contextual” (2) and “composite” (2)]. Maternal educational level was the most frequently evaluated SES indicator (by 11/15 studies) and was most consistently associated with cognitive outcome. Maternal education below high school level was associated with severe cognitive deficiency [reported odds ratios (95 % CI) range: OR = 1.4 (1.0–1.9) to OR = 2.3 (1.2–4.5)]. A meta-analytic measure of the effect of SES was not calculated due to heterogeneity in studies. SES appears to confound the association between preterm birth and cognitive deficit and should be adjusted for in studies reporting cognitive outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saigal, S., den Ouden, L., Wolke, D., Hoult, L., Paneth, N., Streiner, D. L., et al. (2003). School-age outcomes in children who were extremely low birth weight from four international population-based cohorts. Pediatrics, 112(4), 943–950.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aylward, G. P. (2005). Neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants born prematurely. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 26(6), 427–440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhutta, A. T., Cleves, M. A., Casey, P. H., Cradock, M. M., & Anand, K. J. (2002). Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm: a meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(6), 728–737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson, S. (2007). Cognitive and behavioural outcomes following very preterm birth. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 12(5), 363–373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marlow, N. (2004). Neurocognitive outcome after very preterm birth. Archives of Disease Childhood Fetal & Neonatal Edition, 89(3), F224–F228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saigal, S., & Doyle, L. W. (2008). An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet, 371(9608), 261–269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Feinstein, L. (2003). Inequality in the early cognitive development of children in the 1970 cohort. Economica, 70(277), 73–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blumenshine, P., Egerter, S., Barclay, C. J., Cubbin, C., & Braveman, P. A. (2010). Socioeconomic disparities in adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39(3), 263–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Escalona, S. K. (1982). Babies at double hazard: early development of infants at biologic and social risk. Pediatrics, 70(5), 670–676.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Parker, S., Greer, S., & Zuckerman, B. (1988). Double jeopardy: the impact of poverty on early child development. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 35(6), 1227–1240.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ekeus, C., Lindstrom, K., Lindblad, F., Rasmussen, F., & Hjern, A. (2010). Preterm birth, social disadvantage, and cognitive competence in Swedish 18- to 19-year-old men. Pediatrics, 125(1), e67–e73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weisglas-Kuperus, N., Hille, E. T., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Finken, M. J., Wit, J. M., van Buuren, S., et al. (2009). Intelligence of very preterm or very low birthweight infants in young adulthood. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 94(3), F196–F200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bacharach, V. R., & Baumeister, A. A. (1998). Effects of maternal intelligence, marital status, income, and home environment on cognitive development of low birthweight infants. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 23(3), 197–205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chaudhari, S., Otiv, M., Chitale, A., Hoge, M., Pandit, A., & Mote, A. (2005). Biology versus environment in low birth weight children. Indian Pediatrics, 42(8), 763–770.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Levy-Shiff, R., Einat, G., Mogilner, M. B., Lerman, M., & Krikler, R. (1994). Biological and environmental correlates of developmental outcome of prematurely born infants in early adolescence. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 19(1), 63–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baron, I. S., & Rey-Casserly, C. (2010). Extremely preterm birth outcome: a review of four decades of cognitive research. Neuropsychology Review, 20(4), 430–452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hillemeier, M. M., Farkas, G., Morgan, P. L., Martin, M. A., & Maczuga, S. A. (2009). Disparities in the prevalence of cognitive delay: how early do they appear? Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 23(3), 186–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Armstrong, R., Waters, E., Jackson, N., Oliver, S., Popay, J., Shepherd, J., et al. (2007). Guidelines for systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions. Version 2. Australia: Melbourne University. Available at http://ph.cochrane.org/sites/ph.cochrane.org/files/uploads/Guidelines%20HP_PH%20reviews.pdf.

  19. Stroup, D. F., Berlin, J. A., Morton, S. C., Olkin, I., Williamson, G. D., Rennie, D., et al. (2000). Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(15), 2008–2012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Effective Public Health Practice Project. (2002). Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: McMaster University. Available at http://www.ephpp.ca/pdf/qatool.pdf.

  21. Beaino, G., Khoshnood, B., Kaminski, M., Marret, S., Pierrat, V., Vieux, R., et al. (2011). Predictors of the risk of cognitive deficiency in very preterm infants: The EPIPAGE prospective cohort. Acta Paediatrica, 100(3), 370–378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bruggink, J. L., Van Braeckel, K. N., & Bos, A. F. (2010). The early motor repertoire of children born preterm is associated with intelligence at school age. Pediatrics, 125(6), e1356–e1363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen, P. S., Jeng, S. F., & Tsou, K. I. (2004). Developmental function of very-low-birth-weight infants and full-term infants in early childhood. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 103(1), 23–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dall’oglio, A. M., Rossiello, B., Coletti, M. F., Bultrini, M., De Marchis, C., Rava, L., et al. (2010). Do healthy preterm children need neuropsychological follow-up? Preschool outcomes compared with term peers. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 52(10), 955–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dezoete, J. A., MacArthur, B. A., & Tuck, B. (2003). Prediction of Bayley and Stanford-Binet scores with a group of very low birthweight children. Child: Care, Health & Development, 29(5), 367–372.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hack, M., Wilson-Costello, D., Friedman, H., Taylor, G. H., Schluchter, M., & Fanaroff, A. A. (2000). Neurodevelopment and predictors of outcomes of children with birth weights of less than 1000 g: 1992–1995. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 154(7), 725–731.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Johnson, S., Wolke, D., Hennessy, E., & Marlow, N. (2011). Educational outcomes in extremely preterm children: Neuropsychological correlates and predictors of attainment. Developmental Neuropsychology, 36(1), 74–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Laptook, A. R., O’Shea, T. M., Shankaran, S., & Bhaskar, B. (2005). Adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely low birth weight infants with a normal head ultrasound: prevalence and antecedents. Pediatrics, 115(3), 673–680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lowe, J., Erickson, S. J., & MacLean, P. (2010). Cognitive correlates in toddlers born very low birth weight and full-term. Infant Behaviour and Development, 33(4), 629–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Piecuch, R. E., Leonard, C. H., Cooper, B. A., Kilpatrick, S. J., Schlueter, M. A., & Sola, A. (1997). Outcome of infants born at 24–26 weeks’ gestation: II. Neurodevelopmental outcome. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 90(5), 809–814.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Potharst, E. S., van Wassenaer, A. G., Houtzager, B. A., van Hus, J. W., Last, B. F., & Kok, J. H. (2011). High incidence of multi-domain disabilities in very preterm children at five years of age. Journal of Pediatrics, 159(1), 79–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stoelhorst, G. M. S. J., Rijken, M., Martens, S. E., Van Zwieten, P. H. T., Feenstra, J., Zwinderman, A. H., et al. (2003). Developmental outcome at 18 and 24 months of age in very preterm children: A cohort study from 1996 to 1997. Early Human Development, 72(2), 83–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vohr, B. R., Wright, L. L., Dusick, A. M., Perritt, R., Poole, W. K., Tyson, J. E., et al. (2004). Center differences and outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics, 113(4), 781–789.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hack, M., Taylor, H. G., Drotar, D., Schluchter, M., Cartar, L., Wilson-Costello, D., et al. (2005). Poor predictive validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development for cognitive function of extremely low birth weight children at school age. Pediatrics, 116(2), 333–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang, L. W., Wang, S. T., & Huang, C. C. (2008). Preterm infants of educated mothers have better outcome. Acta Paediatrica, 97(5), 568–573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Callanan, C., Doyle, L., Rickards, A., Kelly, E., Ford, G., & Davis, N. (2001). Children followed with difficulty: How do they differ? Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 37(2), 152–156.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hille, E. T., Elbertse, L., Gravenhorst, J. B., Brand, R., & Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P. (2005). Nonresponse bias in a follow-up study of 19-year-old adolescents born as preterm infants. Pediatrics, 116(5), e662–e666.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Tin, W., Fritz, S., Wariyar, U., & Hey, E. (1998). Outcome of very preterm birth: children reviewed with ease at 2 years differ from those followed up with difficulty. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal Edition, 79(2), F83–F87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Shavers, V. L. (2007). Measurement of socioeconomic status in health disparities research. Journal of the National Medical Association, 99(9), 1013–1023.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bendersky, M., & Lewis, M. (1994). Environmental risk, biological risk, and developmental outcome. Developmental Psychology, 30(4), 484–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hack, M., Breslau, N., Aram, D., Weissman, B., Klein, N., & Borawski-Clark, E. (1992). The effect of very low birth weight and social risk on neurocognitive abilities at school age. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 13(6), 412–420.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Fawer, C. L., Besnier, S., Forcada, M., Buclin, T., & Calame, A. (1995). Influence of perinatal, developmental and environmental factors on cognitive abilities of preterm children without major impairments at 5 years. Early Human Development, 43(2), 151–164.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Weisglas-Kuperus, N., Baerts, W., Smrkovsky, M., & Sauer, P. J. (1993). Effects of biological and social factors on the cognitive development of very low birth weight children. Pediatrics, 92(5), 658–665.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. March of Dimes, The Partnership for Maternal, Neonatal & Child Health, Save the Children, & World Health Organization. (2012). In C. P. Howson, M. V. Kinney, & Lawn, J. E. (Ed.), Born too soon: The global action report on preterm births. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at http://www.who.int/pmnch/media/news/2012/201204_borntoosoon-report.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK

    Hilary S. Wong

  2. Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK

    Phil Edwards

Authors
  1. Hilary S. Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Phil Edwards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hilary S. Wong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wong, H.S., Edwards, P. Nature or Nurture: A Systematic Review of the Effect of Socio-economic Status on the Developmental and Cognitive Outcomes of Children Born Preterm. Matern Child Health J 17, 1689–1700 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1183-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1183-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation