Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dientamoeba fragilis in Denmark: epidemiological experience derived from four years of routine real-time PCR

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The intestinal protozoon Dientamoeba fragilis remains a clinical entity of dubious significance. While several previous studies address questions of epidemiology, only a handful have systematically employed and reported on the results from real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), the best currently available diagnostic modality, and the comparison of results from different studies is, therefore, difficult. Since 2007, Statens Serum Institut (Denmark) has utilised qPCR for D. fragilis as routine diagnostic work-up for intestinal parasitosis, testing more than 22,000 samples from 2008 through 2011, and the aim of this study was to report on the results and experiences gained in the process. We demonstrate a staggeringly high proportion (43 %) of investigated patients positive for D. fragilis, ranging from 12 to 71 % depending on age group, showing a bimodal age distribution peaking in children and adults of parental age, as well as a clear association between exposure to children and risk of D. fragilis infection. We discuss these findings in light of the pinworm egg vector hypothesis and substantiate further our knowledge of risk factors pertaining to D. fragilis carriage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banik GR, Barratt JL, Marriott D, Harkness J, Ellis JT, Stark D (2011) A case-controlled study of Dientamoeba fragilis infections in children. Parasitology 138(7):819–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barratt JL, Harkness J, Marriott D, Ellis JT, Stark D (2011) A review of Dientamoeba fragilis carriage in humans: several reasons why this organism should be considered in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal illness. Gut Microbes 2(1):3–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stark D, Barratt J, Roberts T, Marriott D, Harkness J, Ellis J (2010) A review of the clinical presentation of dientamoebiasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 82(4):614–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vandenberg O, Souayah H, Mouchet F, Dediste A, van Gool T (2007) Treatment of Dientamoeba fragilis infection with paromomycin. Pediatr Infect Dis J 26(1):88–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Keystone JS, Yang J, Grisdale D, Harrington M, Pillon L, Andreychuk R (1984) Intestinal parasites in metropolitan Toronto day-care centres. Can Med Assoc J 131(7):733–735

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. de Wit MA, Koopmans MP, Kortbeek LM, van Leeuwen NJ, Vinjé J, van Duynhoven YT (2001) Etiology of gastroenteritis in sentinel general practices in the Netherlands. Clin Infect Dis 33(3):280–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stensvold CR, Arendrup MC, Mølbak K, Nielsen HV (2007) The prevalence of Dientamoeba fragilis in patients with suspected enteroparasitic disease in a metropolitan area in Denmark. Clin Microbiol Infect 13(8):839–842

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stark D, Barratt J, Roberts T, Marriott D, Harkness J, Ellis J (2010) Comparison of microscopy, two xenic culture techniques, conventional and real-time PCR for the detection of Dientamoeba fragilis in clinical stool samples. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29(4):411–416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stensvold CR, Nielsen HV (2012) Comparison of microscopy and PCR for detection of intestinal parasites in Danish patients supports an incentive for molecular screening platforms. J Clin Microbiol 50(2):540–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bart A, van der Heijden HM, Greve S, Speijer D, Landman WJ, van Gool T (2008) Intragenomic variation in the internal transcribed spacer 1 region of Dientamoeba fragilis as a molecular epidemiological marker. J Clin Microbiol 46(10):3270–3275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Barratt JL, Banik GR, Harkness J, Marriott D, Ellis JT, Stark D (2010) Newly defined conditions for the in vitro cultivation and cryopreservation of Dientamoeba fragilis: new techniques set to fast track molecular studies on this organism. Parasitology 137(13):1867–1878

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. King S, Chambers CT, Huguet A et al (2011) The epidemiology of chronic pain in children and adolescents revisited: a systematic review. Pain 152(12):2729–2738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lovell RM, Ford AC (2012) Effect of gender on prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 107(7):991–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Windsor JJ, Johnson EH (1999) Dientamoeba fragilis: the unflagellated human flagellate. Br J Biomed Sci 56(4):293–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson EH, Windsor JJ, Clark CG (2004) Emerging from obscurity: biological, clinical, and diagnostic aspects of Dientamoeba fragilis. Clin Microbiol Rev 17(3):553–570, table of contents

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vandenberg O, Peek R, Souayah H et al (2006) Clinical and microbiological features of dientamoebiasis in patients suspected of suffering from a parasitic gastrointestinal illness: a comparison of Dientamoeba fragilis and Giardia lamblia infections. Int J Infect Dis 10(3):255–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Preiss U, Ockert G, Brömme S, Otto A (1990) Dientamoeba fragilis infection, a cause of gastrointestinal symptoms in childhood. Klin Padiatr 202(2):120–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurt O, Girginkardeşler N, Balcioğlu IC, Ozbilgin A, Ok UZ (2008) A comparison of metronidazole and single-dose ornidazole for the treatment of dientamoebiasis. Clin Microbiol Infect 14(6):601–604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schure JM, de Vries M, Weel JF, van Roon EN, Faber TE (2012) Symptoms and treatment of Dientamoeba fragilis infection in children, a retrospective study. Pediatr Infect Dis J 32(4):e148–e150

    Google Scholar 

  20. Röser D, Nejsum P, Carlsgart AJ, Nielsen HV, Stensvold CR (2013) DNA of Dientamoeba fragilis detected within surface-sterilized eggs of Enterobius vermicularis. Exp Parasitol 133(1):57–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Andersen LO, Röser D, Nejsum P, Nielsen HV, Stensvold CR (2013) Is supplementary bead beating for DNA extraction from nematode eggs by use of the NucliSENS easyMag protocol necessary? J Clin Microbiol 51(4):1345–1347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Verweij JJ, Mulder B, Poell B, van Middelkoop D, Brienen EA, van Lieshout L (2007) Real-time PCR for the detection of Dientamoeba fragilis in fecal samples. Mol Cell Probes 21(5–6):400–404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pedersen CB, Gøtzsche H, Møller JO, Mortensen PB (2006) The Danish Civil Registration System. A cohort of eight million persons. Dan Med Bull 53(4):441–449

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Statistics Denmark (2012) Personal income 2008–2010

  25. Harrell FE (2001) Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ethelberg S, Simonsen J, Gerner-Smidt P, Olsen KE, Mølbak K (2005) Spatial distribution and registry-based case–control analysis of Campylobacter infections in Denmark, 1991–2001. Am J Epidemiol 162(10):1008–1015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22(4):719–748

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Petersen AM, Stensvold CR, Mirsepasi H et al (2013) Active ulcerative colitis associated with low prevalence of Blastocystis and Dientamoeba fragilis infection. Scand J Gastroenterol (in press)

  29. Norberg A, Nord CE, Evengård B (2003) Dientamoeba fragilis—a protozoal infection which may cause severe bowel distress. Clin Microbiol Infect 9(1):65–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang J, Scholten T (1977) Dientamoeba fragilis: a review with notes on its epidemiology, pathogenicity, mode of transmission, and diagnosis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 26(1):16–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Grendon JH, DiGiacomo RF, Frost FJ (1995) Descriptive features of Dientamoeba fragilis infections. J Trop Med Hyg 98(5):309–315

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nachamkin I, Szymanski CM, Blaser MJ (2008) Campylobacter, 3rd edn. ASM Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  33. Glass RI, Becker S, Huq MI et al (1982) Endemic cholera in rural Bangladesh, 1966–1980. Am J Epidemiol 116(6):959–970

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Anderson EJ, Weber SG (2004) Rotavirus infection in adults. Lancet Infect Dis 4(2):91–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. ten Hove R, Schuurman T, Kooistra M, Möller L, van Lieshout L, Verweij JJ (2007) Detection of diarrhoea-causing protozoa in general practice patients in The Netherlands by multiplex real-time PCR. Clin Microbiol Infect 13(10):1001–1007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Statistics Denmark (2012) Denmark in numbers 2012

  37. Barratt JL, Harkness J, Marriott D, Ellis JT, Stark D (2011) The ambiguous life of Dientamoeba fragilis: the need to investigate current hypotheses on transmission. Parasitology 138(5):557–572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Burrows RB, Swerdlow MA (1956) Enterobius vermicularis as a probable vector of Dientamoeba fragilis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 5(2):258–265

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Girginkardeşler N, Kurt O, Kilimcioğlu AA, Ok UZ (2008) Transmission of Dientamoeba fragilis: evaluation of the role of Enterobius vermicularis. Parasitol Int 57(1):72–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lacroix M, Sørensen B (2000) Occurrence of Enterobius vermicularis in children hospitalized at a central hospital. Ugeskr Laeger 162(9):1236–1238

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Herrström P, Friström A, Karlsson A, Högstedt B (1997) Enterobius vermicularis and finger sucking in young Swedish children. Scand J Prim Health Care 15(3):146–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Herrström P, Henricson KA, Råberg A, Karlsson A, Högstedt B (2001) Allergic disease and the infestation of Enterobius vermicularis in Swedish children 4–10 years of age. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 11(3):157–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bøås H, Tapia G, Sødahl JA, Rasmussen T, Rønningen KS (2012) Enterobius vermicularis and risk factors in healthy Norwegian children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 31(9):927–930

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Remm M (2006) Distribution of enterobiasis among nursery school children in SE Estonia and of other helminthiases in Estonia. Parasitol Res 99(6):729–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nejsum P, Parker ED Jr, Frydenberg J et al (2005) Ascariasis is a zoonosis in Denmark. J Clin Microbiol 43(3):1142–1148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Cacciò SM, Sannella AR, Manuali E et al (2012) Pigs as natural hosts of Dientamoeba fragilis genotypes found in humans. Emerg Infect Dis 18(5):838–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sukanahaketu S (1977) The presence of Dientamoeba fragilis in the Ascaris lumbricoides ova: the first report from Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai 60(6):256–258

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Financial support

None.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Röser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Röser, D., Simonsen, J., Nielsen, H.V. et al. Dientamoeba fragilis in Denmark: epidemiological experience derived from four years of routine real-time PCR. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 32, 1303–1310 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-013-1880-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-013-1880-2

Keywords

Navigation