Abstract
The value of the routine chest roentgenogram was studied in 284 patients, newly admitted to our paediatric outpatient department. Emergency patients were excluded from the study. In 141 cases the initial diagnosis after history, physical examination and ECG was “no heart disease”, while in 143 cases it was “heart disease”. After a follow up of up to 4 years, 170 children appeared to have “no heart disease” and 114 definite heart disease. In 7.7% of cases the chest roentgenogram made at the first visit to the outpatient department led to a change in policy, whereas in only 3.8% was the chest roentgenogram in someway helpful in establishing the correct diagnosis. Amongst those children with initial diagnosis of innocent murmur, the chest roentgenogram led to a diagnosis of “heart disease” in only 2.8% of cases. It is concluded that for the differentiation “heart disease” or “no heart disease”, a chest X-ray film is not indicated. In children with “heart disease” the chest X-ray film is also of little value, and is mostly to be used only for documentation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chrispin A, Baker EJ (1987) imaging the heart and the chest. In: Anderson RA, Mcartney EJ, Shinebourne EA, Tynan M (eds) Pediatric cardiology. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 201–233
Geva T, Hegesh J, Frand M (1988) Reappraisal of the approach to the child with heart murmurs: is echocardiography mandatory? Int J Cardiol 19:107–113
Guntheroth WG (1978) Initial evaluation of the child for heart diseae. Pediatr Clin North Am 25:657–675
Newburger JW, Rosenthal A, Williams RG, Fellows K, Miettingen OS (1983) Noninvasive tests in the initial evaluation of heart murmurs in children. N Engl J Med 308:61–64
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Temmerman, A.M., Mooyaart, E.L. & Taverne, P.P. The value of the routine chest roentgenogram in the cardiological evaluation of infants and children. A prospective study. Eur J Pediatr 150, 623–626 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02072620
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02072620