Table 2

All sites unadjusted treatment effects for ECD outcomes at 24 months of age

ECD outcomePooled cohort
(n=667)
Arm 1
(n=217)
Arm 2
(n=230)
Arm 3
(n=220)
Unadjusted pairwise arm comparisons
INTER-NDA domain scores*, median (IQR)
Cognitive30.77 (23.10)30.77 (25.60)30.77 (20.50)36.59 (23.10)H=1.65, p=0.44
η2<0.001
Language50.00 (41.70)47.22 (41.70)47.22 (38.90)51.52 (41.70)H=2.82, p=0.24
η2<0.001
Fine motor11.11 (16.70)11.11 (16.70)11.11 (22.20)11.11 (16.70)H=0.09, p=0.96
η2<0.001
Gross motor11.11 (22.20)11.11 (22.20)22.22 (22.20)22.22 (33.30)H=0.54, p=0.76
η2<0.001
Positive behaviour90.00 (50.00)100.00 (40.00)100.00 (50.00)90.00 (50.00)H=5.05, p=0.08
η2=0.004
Negative behaviour100.00 (25.00)100.00 (25.00)100.00 (25.00)100.00 (50.00)H=3.44, p=0.18
η2=0.002
Risk of severe delay/problems†¶, n (%)
Cognitive246 (36.9)89 (41.0)82 (35.6)75 (34.1)χ2=3.81, p=0.43
Cramer’s V=0.05
Language37 (5.6)17 (7.8)9 (3.9)11 (5.0)χ2=3.95, p=0.41
Cramer’s V=0.06
Fine motor506 (75.9)164 (75.6)170 (73.9)172 (78.2)χ2=3.98, p=0.41
Cramer’s V=0.06
Gross motor506 (75.9)166 (76.5)178 (77.4)162 (73.6)χ2=4.11, p=0.39
Cramer’s V=0.06
Positive behaviour49 (7.4)15 (6.9)18 (7.8)16 (7.3)χ2=6.33, p=0.18
Cramer’s V=0.07
Negative behaviour379 (56.8)136 (62.7)123 (53.5)120 (54.6)χ2=5.92, p=0.21
Cramer’s V=0.07
Risk of any delay/problems‡**, n (%)
Cognitive444 (66.6)150 (69.1)156 (67.8)138 (62.7)χ2=2.26, p=0.32
Cramer’s V=0.06
Language78 (11.7)30 (13.8)21 (9.1)27 (12.3)χ2=2.49, p=0.29
Cramer’s V=0.06
Fine motor583 (87.4)191 (88.0)202 (87.8)190 (86.4)χ2=0.33, p=0.85
Cramer’s V=0.02
Gross motor609 (91.3)195 (89.9)210 (91.3)204 (92.7)χ2=1.13, p=0.56
Cramer’s V=0.04
Positive behaviour173 (25.9)47 (21.7)58 (25.2)68 (30.9)χ2=4.96, p=0.08
Cramer’s V=0.09
Negative behaviour615 (92.2)202 (93.1)214 (93.0)199 (90.5)χ2=1.40, p=0.50,
Cramer’s V=0.05
Vision, median (IQR)(n=613)(n=206)(n=205)(n=202)
Visual acuity (logMar)0.40 (0.20)0.30 (0.20)0.40 (0.30)0.40 (0.10)H=0.33, p=0.85
η2=0.002
Contrast sensitivity (%)3.00 (1.00)3.00 (1.50)3.00 (1.00)3.00 (1.00)H=0.11, p=0.95
η2=0.003
Risk of low vision, n (%)
Visual acuity160 (24.0)53 (24.4)58 (25.2)49 (22.3)χ2=0.70, p=0.71
Cramer’s V=0.03
Contrast sensitivity129 (19.3)46 (21.2)46 (20.0)37 (16.8)χ2=1.54, p=0.46
Cramer’s V=0.05
Cortical auditory ERPs: peak amplitudes (in μV)§, median (IQR)
(n=123)(n=39)(n=39)(n=45)
P1Frequent4.65 (4.36)4.63 (3.84)4.77 (4.68)4.05 (3.18)F=0.39, p=0.67
η2=0.007
Infrequent3.57 (2.27)3.29 (2.55)3.96 (2.31)3.56 (1.93)F=0.89, p=0.41
η2=0.015
Novel3.74 (2.55)3.48 (3.07)3.78 (2.25)3.85 (2.30)F=0.23, p=0.79
η2=0.004
N2Frequent4.30 (8.67)3.31 (3.24)3.19 (2.20)4.14 (3.53)F=1.20, p=0.30
η2=0.02
Infrequent2.81 (1.94)3.34 (2.00)2.39 (1.59)2.62 (2.01)F=2.69, p=0.07
η2=0.04
Novel2.74 (1.98)2.48 (2.06)3.12 (1.30)2.64 (2.38)F=1.10, p=0.34
η2=0.04
P3aFrequent3.68 (3.28)3.52 (2.28)3.90 (3.21)3.09 (1.74)F=1.14, p=0.32
η2=0.02
Infrequent2.93 (1.58)2.65 (1.43)2.98 (1.64)3.14 (1.60)F=1.06, p=0.35
η2=0.02
Novel2.82 (1.70)3.03 (1.81)2.64 (1.52)2.77 (1.78)F=0.53, p=0.59
η2=0.009
Cortical auditory ERPs: latencies (in ms)§, median (IQR)
P1Frequent180.73 (37.92)183.42 (39.22)181.26 (36.18)176.23 (37.59)F=0.40, p=0.67
η2=0.007
Infrequent182.59 (34.01)181.35 (33.42)181.05 (32.70)185.27 (36.57)F=0.20, p=0.82
η2=0.003
Novel190.16 (34.96)189.59 (35.13)181.97 (31.83)197.65 (36.87)F=2.11, p=0.13
η2=0.034
N2Frequent294.29 (26.86)293.13 (30.03)291.14 (25.69)297.40 (24.98)F=0.59, p=0.55
η2=0.01
Infrequent297.78 (30.60)293.78 (33.91)304.27 (27.89)296.23 (29.62)F=1.27, p=0.29
η2=0.02
Novel298.60 (32.33)293.89 (31.79)294.22 (33.51)306.90 (31.14)F=2.25, p=0.11
η2=0.04
P3aFrequent389.33 (32.07)389.86 (36.77)387.42 (29.82)390.45 (30.54)F=0.09, p=0.91
η2=0.002
Infrequent389.32 (34.14)396.31 (35.55)392.44 (33.87)380.08 (32.14)F=2.64, p=0.08
η2=0.04
Novel387.57 (34.31)381.68 (34.26)394.94 (33.71)386.03 (34.81)F=1.52, p=0.22
η2=0.03
  • Arm 1: preconception intervention; arm 2: prenatal intervention; arm 3: no intervention.

  • *For all INTER-NDA outcomes, except negative behaviour, higher scores reflect better outcomes.

  • †For all INTER-NDA outcomes, except negative behaviour, high and any risk of delay are defined as domain scores ≤3rd and ≤10th centiles on the INTER-NDA standards, respectively. For negative behaviour, high and any risk of problems are defined as domain scores ≥97th and ≥90th centiles on the INTER-NDA standards, respectively.

  • ‡For all INTER-NDA outcomes, except negative behaviour, mild-to-moderate risk of delay is defined as domain scores between the 3rd and 10th centiles on the INTER-NDA standards. For negative behaviour, mild-to-moderate risk of delay is defined as domain scores between the 90th and 97th centiles on the INTER-NDA standards.

  • §ERP values presented are averaged across the four temporal electrodes (T3–T6).

  • ¶Comparisons made between arms for children with no delay versus mild-to-moderate delay versus severe delay.

  • **Comparisons made between arms for children with any delay versus no delay. η2=eta square.

  • ECD, early child development; ERP, evoked response potentials; INTER-NDA, INTERGROWTH-21st Neurodevelopment Assessment; logMar, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution.