Table 3

Extent to which field measures (MUAC, WLZ and WAZ) predict undernutrition (low CWG and/or low skinfolds)

Risk factorSensitivityPositive predictive value% (n) with actual undernutritionRisk factorArea under curve (95% CI)
Below risk factor thresholdAbove risk factor thresholdLikelihood ratio
2 weeks to <3m
MUAC <11 cm90%74%74.3 (26)13.0 (3)5.72MUAC0.841 (0.74 to 0.95)
WLZ <−2 SD36%82%81.8 (9)38.1 (16)2.15WLZ0.844 (0.73 to 0.96)
WAZ <−2 SD66%95%95.0 (19)26.3 (10)3.61WAZ0.914 (0.84 to 0.99)
3–6m
MUAC <11 cm44%70%70.0 (7)15.8 (9)4.43MUAC0.877 (0.77 to 0.98)
WLZ <-2SD69%58%57.9 (11)10.4 (5)5.57WLZ0.900 (0.82 to 0.98)
WAZ <-2SD75%75%75.0 (12)7.8 (4)9.62WAZ0.925 (0.84 to 1.00)
Total
MUAC <11 cm73%73%73.3 (33)15.0 (12)4.89MUAC0.862 (0.79 to 0.93)
WLZ <−2 SD49%67%66.7 (20)23.3. (21)2.86WLZ0.841 (0.77 to 0.92)
WAZ <−2 SD69%86%86.1 (31)15.7 (14)5.48WAZ0.896 (0.84 to 0.96)
MUAC <11 cm or WAZ <−2 SD90%82%74% (39)8.3% (6)8.67
  • CWG, conditional weight gain; MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference; WAZ, weight-for-age Z-scores; WLZ, weight-for-length Z-scores.