Table 4

Performance at optimal score

PEWS (AUROC rank)Optimal score/maximum scoreCase patients (n=297)Control patients (n=311)Sensitivity (95% CI)Specificity (95% CI)PPV (95% CI)NPV (95% CI)LR +ve (95% CI)LR −ve (95% CI)Median hours to event (inter-quartile range)
Score at or above threshold (TP)Score below threshold (FN)Score at or above threshold (FP)Score below threshold (TN)
Scoring systems
Cardiff and Vale PEWS (1)3/823859442670.80 (0.75 to 0.84)0.86 (0.81 to 0.89)0.84 (0.80 to 0.88)0.82 (0.77 to 0.86)5.66 (4.28 to 7.49)0.23 (0.18 to 0.29)26.60 (11.57 to 42.19)
Bedside PEWS (2)6/2621582352760.72 (0.67 to 0.77)0.89 (0.85 to 0.92)0.860 (0.81 to 0.90)0.77 (0.72 to 0.81)6.43 (4.67 to 8.86)0.311 (0.26 to 0.37)26.25 (13.94 to 43.29)
Modified PEWS III (3)7/2820493282830.69 (0.63 to 0.74)0.91 (0.87 to 0.94)0.879 (0.83 to 0.92)0.75 (0.71 to 0.80)7.63 (5.31 to 10.95)0.34 (0.29 to 0.41)21.61 (12.42 to 40.10)
Modified PEWS II (4)6/2622869632480.83 (0.78 to 0.87)0.71 (0.66 to 0.76)0.731 (0.68 to 0.78)0.81 (0.76 to 0.85)2.85 (2.38 to 3.42)0.25 (0.19 to 0.32)36.57 (16.57 to 46.00)
Children's Early Warning Tool (4)4/2424552902210.77 (0.72 to 0.81)0.80 (0.75 to 0.84)0.784 (0.73 to 0.83)0.78 (0.73 to 0.83)3.79 (3.01 to 4.77)0.29 (0.24 to 0.36)37.66 (22.39 to 44.74)
PEWS I (6)3/1024750992120.83 (0.78 to 0.87)0.68 (0.63 to 0.73)0.714 (0.66 to 0.76)0.81 (0.76 to 0.85)2.61 (2.20 to 3.10)0.25 (0.19 to 0.32)24.00 (11.23 –44.13)
NHSI PEWS (7)2/7247501082030.83 (0.78 to 0.87)0.65 (0.60 to 0.71)0.696 (0.65 to 0.74)0.80 (0.75 to 085)2.40 (2.04 to 2.81)0.26 (0.20 to 0.33)29.90 (14.57 to 43.63)
PEWS system score (7)9/3220790782330.70 (0.64 to 0.75)0.75 (0.70 to 0.80)0.726 (0.67 to 0.78)0.72 (0.70 to 0.77)2.78 (2.26 to 3.42)0.40 (0.34 to 0.48)39.50 (17.43 to 46.57)
PEWS II (9)4/13181116502610.61 (0.55 to 0.67)0.84 (0.79 to 0.88)0.784 (0.72 to 0.83)0.69 (0.64 to 0.74)3.79 (2.89 to 4.96)0.47 (0.40 to 0.54)26.00 (11.75 to 41.58)
CEWS (9)4/21179118482630.60 (0.54 to 0.66)0.85 (0.80 to 0.88)0.789 (0.73 to 0.84)0.69 (0.64 to 0.74)3.91 (2.96 to 5.15)0.47 (0.41 to 0.54)21.05 (10.38 to 40.12)
ITAT score (11)3/820295822290.68 (0.62 to 0.73)0.74 (0.68 to 0.78)0.711 (0.65 to 0.76)0.71 (0.65 to 0.76)2.58 (2.11 to 3.16)0.43 (0.37 to 0.51)28.95 (14.70 to 43.96)
Modified PEWS I (12)4/9135162312800.46 (0.40 to 0.51)0.90 (0.86 to 0.93)0.813 (0.74 to 0.87)0.63 (0.59 to 0.68)4.56 (3.19 to 6.51)0.61 (0.55 to 0.67)17.00 (6.75 to 35.68)
Trigger systems
THSC MET calling criteria (13)1 or more triggers267301381730.90 (0.86 to 0.93)0.56 (0.50 to 0.61)0.66 (0.61 to 0.71)0.85 (0.79 to 0.90)2.03 (1.78 to 2.31)0.18 (0.13 to 0.26)27.90 (13.74 to 42.37)
MET activation criteria I (14)1 or more triggers276211581530.93 (0.89 to 0.96)0.49 (0.44 to 0.55)0.64 (0.59 to 0.68)0.88 (0.82 to 0.92)1.83 (1.63 to 2.05)0.14 (0.10 to 0.22)33.87 (18.76 to 45.52)
MET activation criteria II (14)1 or more triggers276211581530.923 (0.89 to 0.96)0.49 (0.44 to 0.55)0.64 (0.59 to 0.68)0.88 (0.82 to 0.92)1.83 (1.63 to 2.05)0.14 (0.10 to 0.22)33.92 (18.76 to 45.52)
PMET triggers I (14)1 or more triggers273241571540.92 (0.88 to 0.95)0.50 (0.44 to 0.55)0.64 (0.59 to 0.68)0.87 (0.80 to 0.68)1.82 (1.62 to 2.04)0.16 (0.11 to 0.24)33.25 (16.90 to 45.42)
Modified Bristol PEWS (17)1 or more triggers28611223880.96 (0.93 to 0.98)0.28 (0.23 to 0.34)0.56 (0.52 to 0.61)0.90 (0.81 to 0.94)1.34 (1.25 to 1.45)0.13 (0.07 to 0.24)39.83 (23.82 to 46.25)
Bristol PEWS (17)1 or more triggers28512223880.96 (0.93 to 0.98)0.28 (0.23 to 0.34)0.56 (0.52 to 0.61)0.88 (0.80 to 0.93)1.34 (1.24 to 1.44)0.14 (0.08 to 0.25)39.73 (23.45 to 46.25)
  • The optimal score for trigger systems was determined as 1. The optimal score for scoring systems was determined as the cut-point which demonstrated the maximum value for the sum of the sensitivity and specificity, as described by Edwards et al.18 As such, this differed between different scoring systems.

  • The hours to event was calculated as the number of hours between the case patient's first achieving the optimal score/trigger to the occurrence of the critical deterioration event.

  • AUROC, area under the receiver operator characteristic curve; CEWS, Children's Early Warning Score; FN, false negative; FP, false positive; ITAT, inpatient triage, assessment and treatment score; LR +ve, positive likelihood ratio; LR –ve, negative likelihood ratio; MET, Medical Emergency Team; NHSI, NHS Institute; NPV, negative predictive value; PEWS, paediatric early warning system; PMET, Paediatric Medical Emergency Team; PPV, positive predictive value; THSC, Toronto Hospital for Sick Children; TN, true negative; TP, true positive.