Table 3

Literature used to inform relationship between surrogate outcomes and cases of maltreatment

Intermediate outcomeRelationshipRelationship used in sensitivity analysisAssumptionAbuse outcomeReferenceInterventions utilising this relationship
Injury in those less than age 15.17% of those with an injury up until age 1 also had child protection contact2.585% to 10.34%Each contact represents a new childChild protection substantiationPratt 667, 27b
Hospitalisation for injury*OR of 9.6 for child maltreatment allegation with every one admission for injury per year (indicates a 9.6 times greater likelihood of a maltreatment report for children hospitalised for injury)OR 95% CI 7.86 to 11.83Baseline allegation rate of 0.0465 South Australia 2005/0667Child protection reportO'Donnell et al 1223b, 20, 24b
Hospitalisation all causesOR of 1.49 for child maltreatment allegation with every one admission per year (indicates a 1.49 greater likelihood of a maltreatment report for children hospitalised for all causes)OR 95% CI 1.44 to 1.53Baseline allegation rate 0.0465 South Australia 2005/0667Child protection reportO'Donnell et al 1215, 10, 26
  • * For this outcome hospitalisations and emergency department attendance are treated the same.

  • No confidence limits are available as this is an actual rate. Therefore, the figures used in sensitivity analysis are double and half the rate reported in the original study. Wide limits have been used due to the smaller sample size used in this Australian cohort (11 000 children).