Table 3 Difference in outcomes between pupils from schools allocated to intervention and those allocated to control at the end of 5 months follow-up
OutcomeMean difference (95% CI) or odds ratio (95% CI) for outcome at 5 months comparing intervention to control group*p Value
Taking account of clustering within schools
Screen viewing on weekdays (minutes)−11.6 (−42.7 to 19.4)0.42
Screen viewing on Saturdays (minutes)−15.4 (−57.5 to 26.8)0.50
BMI0.10 (−0.27 to 0.46)0.58
Obesity (odds ratio)0.68 (0.24 to 1.94)0.68
Walks/cycles to and from school (odds ratio)0.45 (0.18 to 1.14)0.09
Without taking account of clustering within schools
Screen viewing on weekdays (minutes)−12.9 (−38.6 to 12.7)0.32
Screen viewing on Saturdays (minutes)−15.1 (−46.1 to 16.0)0.34
BMI0.10 (−0.18 to 0.39)0.50
Obesity (odds ratio)0.68 (0.27 to 1.74)0.42
Walks/cycles to and from school (odds ratio)0.45 (0.27 to 0.75)0.002
  • *All results are adjusted for age, sex and baseline characteristic (eg, screen viewing on weekdays at follow-up is adjusted for screen viewing on weekdays at baseline).

  • For the mean differences in screen viewing and BMI, the null value is 0; a negative value indicates that the mean level of the outcome is lower in the intervention group compared with the control group (ie, for these three outcomes a negative value indicates a beneficial effect for pupils in the intervention schools); a positive value indicates the mean level of the outcome is higher in the intervention group compared with the control group.

  • For the odds ratios of obesity and walking/cycling to school the null value is 1; a value below 1 indicates reduced odds of the outcome in the intervention group compared with the control group (ie, for obesity a value below 1 indicates a beneficial effect for pupils in the intervention schools whereas for walking/cycling to school a value below 1 indicates that the pupils from the intervention schools were less likely to walk or cycle to school at the end of the intervention).