Table 4

 Clinical utility of the children’s head injury algorithm for the prediction of important clinical events rule

No clinically significant head injuryClinically significant head injuryTotal
CHALICE negative19 558419 562
CHALICE positive2 9332773 210
Total22 49128122 772
Sensitivity98.6%(96.4% to 99.6%)
Specificity86.9%(86.5% to 87.4%)
Positive predictive value8.63%(7.68% to 9.65%)
Negative predictive value99.9%(99.9% to 100%)
CT ordering rate14.1%(13.6% to 14.6%)
Performance of CHALICE rule for patients with GCS 13–15
No significant intracranial pathologySignificant intracranial pathologyTotal
CHALICE negative19 558419 562
CHALICE positive2 8531643 017
Total22 41116822 579
Sensitivity97.6%(94.0% to 99.4%)
Specificity87.3%(86.8% to 87.7%)
Positive predictive value5.44%(4.65% to 6.31%)
Negative predictive value99.9%(99.9% to 100%)
CT ordering rate13.3%(12.9% to 13.8%)
Performance of CHALICE rule for prediction of neurosurgical intervention
No neurosurgical interventionNeurosurgical interventionTotal
CHALICE, children’s head injury algorithm for the prediction of important clinical events; CT, computed tomography; GCS, Glasgow Coma Score.
Values in parentheses are 95% CI.
CHALICE negative19 559319 562
CHALICE positive3 0761343 210
Total22 63513722 772
Sensitivity97.8%(93.7% to 99.6%)
Specificity86.4%(86.0% to 86.9%)