TY - JOUR T1 - Are we doing ineffective CPR? JF - Archives of Disease in Childhood JO - Arch Dis Child SP - 389 LP - 390 DO - 10.1136/archdischild-2016-312004 VL - 102 IS - 5 AU - Lisa A DelSignore AU - Robert C Tasker Y1 - 2017/05/01 UR - http://adc.bmj.com/content/102/5/389.abstract N2 - Being competent in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a skill in which all paediatricians need expertise. Proficiency in CPR has, traditionally, been acquired through on-the-job training and live-instructor classes using simulated scenarios with manikins. Hospitals require paediatricians to obtain annual certification of CPR proficiency through demonstration of knowledge in a written or computer-based test, as well as by performance during direct observation of technique using a manikin. However, it is well recognised that such performance ‘extinguishes’ (ie, deteriorates) rapidly within 3–6 months after initial training if knowledge and skills are not reinforced by subsequent learning and practice.1 Thus, a question remains: how often are we routinely performing effective CPR2 when it happens outside of an observed and tested educational session?In this issue, Gregson et al3 provide evidence demonstrating that simulated CPR in a resuscitation manikin can be performed better when healthcare providers are given direct and real-time feedback from an automated audiovisual feedback device. The device evaluates the rate, depth, force applied, chest recoil and pauses during the … ER -