RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Who comes back with what: a retrospective database study on reasons for emergency readmission to hospital in children and young people in England
JF Archives of Disease in Childhood
JO Arch Dis Child
FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
SP 714
OP 718
DO 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309290
VO 101
IS 8
A1 Linda P M M Wijlaars
A1 Pia Hardelid
A1 Jenny Woodman
A1 Janice Allister
A1 Ronny Cheung
A1 Ruth Gilbert
YR 2016
UL http://adc.bmj.com/content/101/8/714.abstract
AB Objective To determine the proportion of children and young people (CYP) in England who are readmitted for the same condition.Design Retrospective cohort study.Setting National administrative hospital data (Hospital Episode Statistics).Participants CYP (0-year-olds to 24-year-olds) discharged after an emergency admission to the National Health Service in England in 2009/2010.Main outcome measures Coded primary diagnosis classified in six broad groups indicating reason for admission (infection, chronic condition, injury, perinatal related or pregnancy related, sign or symptom or other). We grouped readmissions as ≤30 days or between 31 days and 2 years after the index discharge. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine factors at the index admission that were predictive of readmission within 30 days.Results 9% of CYP were readmitted within 30 days. Half of the 30-day readmissions and 40% of the recurrent admissions between 30 days and 2 years had the same primary diagnosis group as the original admission. These proportions were consistent across age, sex and diagnostic groups, except for infants and young women with pregnancy-related problems (15–24 years) who were more likely to be readmitted for the same primary diagnostic group. CYP with underlying chronic conditions were readmitted within 30 days twice as often (OR: 1.93, 95% CI 1.89 to 1.99) compared with CYP without chronic conditions.Conclusions Financial penalties for readmission are expected to incentivise more effective care of the original problem, thereby avoiding readmission. Our findings, that half of children come back with different problems, do not support this presumption.