TY - JOUR T1 - Effectiveness of hand hygiene interventions in reducing illness absence among children in educational settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis JF - Archives of Disease in Childhood JO - Arch Dis Child SP - 42 LP - 50 DO - 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308875 VL - 101 IS - 1 AU - Micky Willmott AU - Alexandra Nicholson AU - Heide Busse AU - Georgina J MacArthur AU - Sara Brookes AU - Rona Campbell Y1 - 2016/01/01 UR - http://adc.bmj.com/content/101/1/42.abstract N2 - Objective To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis to establish the effectiveness of handwashing in reducing absence and/or the spread of respiratory tract (RT) and/or gastrointestinal (GI) infection among school-aged children and/or staff in educational settings.Design Randomised-controlled trials (RCTs).Setting Schools and other settings with a formal educational component in any country.Patients Children aged 3–11 years, and/or staff working with them.Intervention Interventions with a hand hygiene component.Main outcome measures Incidence of RT or GI infections or symptoms related to such infections; absenteeism; laboratory results of RT and/or GI infections.Results Eighteen cluster RCTs were identified; 13 school-based, 5 in child day care facilities or preschools. Studies were heterogeneous and had significant quality issues including small numbers of clusters and participants and inadequate randomisation. Individual study results suggest interventions may reduce children's absence, RT infection incidence and symptoms, and laboratory confirmed influenza-like illness. Evidence of impact on GI infection or symptoms was equivocal.Conclusions Studies are generally not well executed or reported. Despite updating existing systematic reviews and identifying new studies, evidence of the effect of hand hygiene interventions on infection incidence in educational settings is mostly equivocal but they may decrease RT infection among children. These results update and add to knowledge about this crucial public health issue in key settings with a vulnerable population. More robust, well reported cluster RCTs which learn from existing studies, are required. ER -