TY - JOUR T1 - G263 MRCPCH Clinical Success Initiative (CSI) JF - Archives of Disease in Childhood JO - Arch Dis Child SP - A113 LP - A114 DO - 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306237.260 VL - 99 IS - Suppl 1 AU - EC Ferguson AU - JN Bryan AU - JA Ellis AU - A McMahon Y1 - 2014/04/01 UR - http://adc.bmj.com/content/99/Suppl_1/A113.4.abstract N2 - Background The Membership of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (MRCPCH) clinical examination, represents the final hurdle for paediatric trainees in achieving full membership of the college and is necessary for training progression. In our locality, the MRCPCH clinical examination pass rate had raised concerns. Repeated examination attempts are stressful, financially demanding, and can affect career progression. Examination failure can impact significantly on workforce planning. Aim To introduce a revision initiative for paediatric trainees to improve the MRCPCH clinical pass rate. Method Locally, prior to October 2012, revision sessions were organised by trainees themselves, with more senior trainees and consultants supporting candidates with ad-hoc teaching sessions prior to the examination. Commencing prior to the 3rd 2012 clinical examination sitting, the local Postgraduate Medical Education (PGME) department initiated a structured revision timetable for trainees in the six weeks prior to the clinical examinations. Results MRCPCH Clinical examination pass rates were reviewed prior to, and after the introduction of the programme. Comparisons have been drawn within the deanery and nationally. Trainees have given anonymised feedback on the programme. All trainees undertaking the MRCPCH Clinical examination since the initiative was launched have engaged with the programme and trainee feedback has been unanimously positive. Table 1 illustrates the improvement in the local examination pass rate following the introduction of the CSI, from 43.3% in the preceding year to 78.5%. View this table:Abstract G263 Table 1 The local pass rate is now surpassing both the deanery-wide and the national pass rates (see Graph 1). Discussion PGME organisation has facilitated targeted training, improved teaching attendance, and allowed consultant flexibility to organise opportunistic teaching in a co-ordinated manner with selected cases. Significantly, since the introduction of this initiative, no outcome 4 has been given to any trainee. Conclusion The success of this initiative highlights the benefits for trainees of a supportive revision programme at local level in improving examination success. Abstract G263 Figure 1 ER -