TY - JOUR T1 - Does adjustment of GFR to extracellular fluid volume improve the clinical utility of cystatin C? JF - Archives of Disease in Childhood JO - Arch Dis Child SP - 499 LP - 502 DO - 10.1136/adc.82.6.499 VL - 82 IS - 6 AU - Eric S Kilpatrick AU - Brian G Keevil AU - G Michael Addison Y1 - 2000/06/01 UR - http://adc.bmj.com/content/82/6/499.abstract N2 - BACKGROUND Cystatin C measurement has been proposed as a replacement for creatinine as a serum measure of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). It has also been suggested that GFR itself should be adjusted to the extracellular fluid volume (ECV) of a child rather than the body surface area (BSA). AIMS To assess the potential of cystatin C compared to serum creatinine in assessing GFR and to establish whether adjustment of GFR to ECV rather than BSA affects the potential usefulness of cystatin C. METHODS Cystatin C and plasma creatinine were measured in 64 paediatric patients undergoing 7751Cr-EDTA GFR measurements over a six month period. RESULTS 1/cystatin C concentrations were more closely related to GFR (median 98 ml/min/1.73 m2, range 8–172) after adjustment for patient BSA (r = 0.81 versusr = 0.44). 1/Creatinine concentrations appeared to be an inferior estimate of BSA adjusted GFR (r = 0.41), even following the use of the Schwartz formula (r = 0.37). Bland Altman statistics showed cystatin C could still only predict 95% of GFR values to within ±41 ml/min/1.73 m2 of the51Cr-EDTA method. The relation between GFR and 1/cystatin C was not improved by adjusting 51Cr-EDTA GFR to ECV rather than BSA (r = 0.76 versusr = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS Cystatin C appears superior to serum creatinine in paediatric subjects although its performance is unlikely to supplant 51Cr-EDTA GFR measurement. This performance is not being underestimated because of adjusting GFR to BSA rather than ECV. ER -