Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Adaptive and innovative study design in rare diseases
  1. Athimalaipet V Ramanan1,2,
  2. James M S Wason3
  1. 1Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK
  2. 2Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  3. 3Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Athimalaipet V Ramanan, Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK; avramanan{at}hotmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Challenges in rare disease trials

Rare diseases are defined in the European Union as ones that affect fewer than one person in 2000. Although individually rare, there are more than 6000 rare diseases with more than half of them starting in childhood. As a result, there are approximately 3.5 million individuals with rare diseases in the UK. These rare diseases have significant impact on children and their families with more than 30% of children dying before the age of 5 years.1

Rare diseases in children generally lack focused development of new treatments. One of the important reasons behind this is the difficulty in doing clinical trials using traditional design: the number of patients available to recruit is often too limited to do well-powered randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Paediatric trials have significant complexities and very few patients/parents are keen on placebo controlled trials.2

With methodological developments in the past decade, there is now an array of alternative approaches that can be used to make clinical trials more efficient. Adaptive designs allow outcome data collected during the trial to make changes to the trial such that it is more efficient and patient-centric; master protocols allow combining of what would normally have been distinct trials into one, allowing more research questions to be answered with the same limited pool of patients; methods for using external data can be employed when it is impossible to do a traditional RCT.

In this viewpoint, we overview these approaches and discuss how they could transform rare paediatric disease research. All designs are overviewed in table 1.

View this table:
Table 1

Overview of innovative designs and their potential for rare diseases

Adaptive designs

Adaptive designs3 are a broad type of trial design that offer …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Correction notice This article has been corrected since it was first published. The funding statement has been updated.

  • Funding AVR is in part supported by MRC funding (ref MR/R013926/1). JW is funded by an NIHR Research Professorship (NIHR301614).

  • Competing interests JW—none relevant to the manuscript but funding to institution from AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Hemay, Mirobio, Nemeysis, Novartis, Orbsen, UCB and Worg. AVR—none relevant to the manuscript; speaker fees/honoraria/consultancy from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, UCB, SOBI, Novartis, AstraZeneca and Roche.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.