Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Can the government’s new integrated care systems deliver for children in England?
  1. Sally Ruane
  1. Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sally Ruane, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK; sruane{at}dmu.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Children’s healthcare is suffering from many of the same problems besetting services for adults, although in some instances more acutely. Earlier this year, the respected Nuffield Trust1 warned that children were facing lengthening waiting times for both planned hospital and mental healthcare at a time when the burden of mental ill health is growing rapidly. The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) has repeatedly signalled its concern about worsening health inequalities among children.2

In theory, the government’s new integrated care systems (ICS) for the National Health Service (NHS) in England are very relevant to this. The idea is that greater joint working and system-wide planning will foster the development of new care pathways which reduce unit costs, for example by substituting community-based care for hospital care and cheaper staff for more expensive ones, enabling more patients to be treated for a given budget. Moreover, the new integrated care boards will have a duty to reduce health inequalities, something especially welcomed by the RCPCH. However, exhausted by workload pressures, the unrelenting nature of the ‘pandemic surge – recovery’ combination and the corrosive effect of good will constantly being taken for granted, some clinical staff and service managers may well be forgiven for wondering whether ICS are at best just another top-down reorganisation and at worst in danger of creating as many problems as …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @SallyRuane

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.