Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Courts guiding doctors: declaring clinical practice in advance
  1. Robert Wheeler
  1. Paediatric Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Robert Wheeler, Paediatric Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; robert.wheeler{at}uhs.nhs.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

English Courts provide a variety of services to society. In relation to crime, courts sentence those successfully prosecuted. Civil wrongs between private citizens are adjudicated; the tort of clinical negligence is an ubiquitous example. The High Court is empowered to award damages, among other remedies. One of these ‘remedies’ is to make declarations, whereby the lawfulness of all aspects of care and treatment of incapacitated adults and children can be determined. The Court of Protection, dealing with incapacitated people of 16 years and over, is authorised by the Mental Capacity Act 2005 to make declarations as to whether clinical steps in relation to the patient are or will be lawful.

This declaratory jurisdiction may be considered as part of the common law’s ‘great safety net’ (DL v A Local Authority [2012] EWCA Civ 253), filling gaps in the law where necessary. But a declaration changes nothing: It cannot make lawful that which without the declaration would be unlawful; and whatever may be declared lawful was equally lawful prior to the declaration being made.1 Nonetheless, the hospital that obtains a declaration has a measure of reassurance that it is acting within the law.

The legal position can in some circumstances be declared in advance, rather than waiting until treatment has occurred, (and then asking whether in retrospect it was lawful). Anticipatory declarations may not always be appropriate ‘…since they should only extend to matters where the factual basis is known. This makes it unwise to endorse aspects of …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Funding The author has not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.