You are here

Article Text

Article menu

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
PostScript
Letter
Age of consent?
  1. Nick Brown1,2,
  2. Joseph Brown2
  1. 1 Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, International Maternal and Child Health (IMCH), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  2. 2 Department of Paediatrics, Länssjukhuset Gävle-Sandviken, Gävle, Sweden
  1. Correspondence to Dr Nick Brown, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, International Maternal and Child Health (IMCH), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; nickjwbrown{at}gmail.com

https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-318106

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    The recent thought-provoking piece by Neena Modi, ‘Votes for a better future’1 argued the case for entrusting parents with an additional vote for each of their children. Though this, rather exhilarating, idea might take time in gestation, it takes no more than a simple extrapolation of the central hypothesis to infer that the natural first step in the process has to be a change in the current law around voting age.

    The law is riddled with incongruities in this area: in the UK, the age of paid employment, legal sex, enrolment in the military among others is …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles

    • Leading article
      Votes for a better future
      Neena Modi
      Archives of Disease in Childhood 2019; 105 13-14 Published Online First: 16 May 2019. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316523