Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
Making sense of strategic clinical networks
  1. Andy Spencer1,
  2. Carol Ewing2,
  3. Steve Cropper3
  1. 1University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire, UK
  2. 2Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Officer for Workforce Planning, Manchester, UK
  3. 3School of Public Policy & Professional Practice and Research Institute of Social Sciences, Keele University, Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr S A Spencer, University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust, Neonatal Unit, Maternity Hospital, Newcastle Road, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST4 6QG, UK; andy.spencer{at}

Statistics from


Maternity and children's services are one of the four service areas for which Strategic Clinical Networks1 (SCN) have been designated in England. Is this latest introduction to the new commissioning framework good news or something that will hardly impinge on the working lives of most paediatricians? More importantly, will this impact on the health outcomes for babies, children and young people (CYP)? Certainly there is much room for improvement; across the UK there remains huge variation in both health and service quality for children.2–4 Furthermore, a review of health services across Western Europe has recorded that the UK has moved from the average to the worst for ‘all-cause’ mortality rate for children aged 0–14 years. There are many reasons for this statistic, but the authors concluded that some health systems are not keeping up with the changing health needs of children, and that a whole-system approach is required to improve outcomes.5 Consequently, if SCNs provide an opportunity to make the necessary cross-organisational changes to service, then it is beholden on paediatricians to engage.

Background to the development of SCNs

NHS England's (NHS-E) statement of its intentions to host and support SCNs started by observing1 that: “Clinical networks are an NHS success story…networks perform varied and valuable roles…” A recently published book,6 which assesses the development of managed clinical networks to date, concludes that while the record is perhaps rather more mixed, nevertheless, clinical networks “should be given more time to develop and reach their potential”. Networks can make effective use of scarce resources, bridge the cracks between services offered by ‘self-interested’ NHS organisations, and move knowledge around clinical communities more effectively than hierarchy and the market.

1996 was a key year for the idea of networks. A review7 argued that there have always been networks in the NHS but ‘ad hoc’ …

View Full Text


  • Contributors All three authors contributed around 600 words to the first draft. All three editors have been involved in commenting and improving successive drafts, with Dr Spencer having editorial control.

  • Competing interests Dr Spencer is Clinical Director for the West Midland Strategic Clinical Network for Maternity and Children. Dr Ewing is the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Officer for Workforce Planning and is also working as a clinical adviser on an interim basis with the Greater Manchester, Lancashire and South Cumbria Strategic Clinical Networks and Senate.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.