Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
Stabilisation of critically ill children at the district general hospital prior to intensive care retrieval: a snapshot of current practice
  1. Simona Lampariello (slampariello{at}doctors.org.uk)
  1. Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom
    1. Mark Clement (clemem{at}gosh.nhs.uk)
    1. Children's Acute Transport Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
      1. Ashok P Aralihond (aralia{at}gosh.nhs.uk)
      1. Children's Acute Transport Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
        1. Daniel Lutman (lutmaa{at}gosh.nhs.uk)
        1. Children's Acute Transport Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
          1. Mary A Montgomery (montgm{at}gosh.nhs.uk)
          1. Children's Acute Transport Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
            1. Andy Petros (petroa{at}cats.nhs.uk)
            1. Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
              1. Padmanabhan Ramnarayan (ramnarayan{at}msn.com)
              1. Children's Acute Transport Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom

                Abstract

                Objective: To describe current practice during stabilisation of children presenting with critical illness to the district general hospital, preceding retrieval to intensive care.

                Design: Observational study using prospectively collected transport data.

                Setting: A centralised intensive care retrieval service in England and referring district general hospitals.

                Patients: Emergency transports to intensive care during two-month epochs from 4 consecutive years (2005-2008).

                Interventions: None.

                Main outcome measures: Proportion of key airway, breathing, circulatory and neurological stabilisation procedures, such as endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, vascular access and initiation of inotropic agents, performed by referring hospital staff prior to the arrival of the retrieval team.

                Results: 706 emergency retrievals were examined over a 4-year period. The median age of transported children was 10 months (IQR 18 days to 43 months). District general hospital staff performed the majority of endotracheal intubations (93.7%, CI 91.3-95.5%), initiated mechanical ventilation in 76.9% of cases (CI 73.0-80.4%), inserted central venous catheters frequently (67.4%, CI 61.7-72.6%) and initiated inotropic agents in 43.7% (CI 36.6-51.1%). The retrieval team was more likely to perform interventions such as re-intubation for air-leak, repositioning of misplaced tracheal tubes and administration of osmotic agents for raised intracranial pressure. The performance of one or more interventions by the retrieval team was associated with severity of illness, rather than patient age, diagnostic group or team response time (OR 3.62, 95% CI 1.47-8.92).

                Conclusions: District general hospital staff appropriately perform the majority of initial stabilisation procedures in critically ill children prior to retrieval. This practice has not changed significantly over the past four years, attesting to the crucial role played by district hospital staff in a centralised model of paediatric intensive care.

                Statistics from Altmetric.com

                Request Permissions

                If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.