You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Drug therapy
Editorial
Avoiding clinical trials in children
  1. Helen M Sammons
  1. Correspondence to Helen M Sammons, Academic Division of Child Health, University of Nottingham, The Medical School, Clinical Sciences, Derbyshire Children's Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby DE22 3DT, UK; helen.sammons{at}nottingham.ac.uk

https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2010.203737

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Clinical trials of medicines in children are essential. So it may seem strange, despite recent lobbying and legislation, to discuss when clinical trials in children can be avoided. One specific aim of the Paediatric Regulation was that it should improve the health of children in Europe without subjecting children to unnecessary trials.1 A clinical trial in children should only take place when the information cannot be gained from a trial in the adult population. This should always be kept in mind when planning a protocol. Can the information be reliably obtained from adults? The article by Mulla et al in this month's Drug therapy is a good example of how this can be put into practice and clinical trials in children avoided.2

    Drug development

    Differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and adverse reactions, are common in children compared to adults. Growth and maturation processes, as well as certain specific diseases, are unique to children.3 However, it is rare that a phase I study takes place in children. Phase I trials are the first stage of testing in …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests Helen Sammons is a member of the Ethics Advisory Board for the TINN (Treat Infection in Neonates) Project.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.