Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Googly from down under: hearing impairment and early intervention
  1. V K Das1,
  2. R V Das2
  1. 1University Department of Audiological Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
  2. 2Medical student, University of Manchester, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr V K Das
    University Department of Audiological Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK; vijay.dascmmc.nhs.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Commentary on the paper by Wake et al (see 238)

The field of audiological medicine has ridden the wave of technological advancement that has transformed many aspects of screening and intervention in medicine. We can screen newborns for hearing loss, however we are not sure what is the most cost effective and simple method. A screening test that can be referred to as the “golden standard”, still eludes us. With the incidence of permanent bilateral clinically significant hearing loss at just over 1 in 1000 births,1,2 the need for a simple, inexpensive, and reliable screening method is evident.

The importance of diagnosing hearing loss at an early stage led to screening originally of “at risk” groups in the form of a targeted screening programme. This approach has proved to be effective as over half of hearing impaired and deaf children can be identified. To identify the other half of hearing impaired children, universal newborn screening programmes are being used in countries including the UK. Various combinations of oto-acoustic emissions and auditory brain stem tests singly or in combination have been successfully tried. Early fitting of technically sophisticated hearing aids …

View Full Text

Linked Articles