Article Text

Download PDFPDF

PS-021 Electrical Cardiometry Stroke Volume Evaluation In Nicu: Comparison With Functional Echocardiography
  1. A Boet1,
  2. G Jourdain2,
  3. A Capderou3,
  4. O Grollmuss4,
  5. P Labrune1,
  6. D De Luca1,
  7. S Demontoux4
  1. 1Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, CHU Antoine Béclère South Paris University Hospital, Clamart, France
  2. 2Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care Pediatric S. M. U. R, CHU Antoine Béclère South Paris University Hospital, Clamart, France
  3. 3INSERM 999, South Paris University Hospital, Le Plessis Robinson, France
  4. 4Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, South Paris University Hospital, Le Plessis Robinson, France


Background Evaluation of cardiac output in neonates might be difficult because of the complexity and risks of invasive classical procedures. New systems like electrical cardiometry (EC: Osypka Medical, Berlin, Germany and La Jolla, California, USA) have been proposed but few data are available in neonates. We investigated stroke volume (SV) using EC in term and preterm infants.

Methods Eligible patients were neonates admitted to the NICU and undergoing echocardiography for any clinical reasons, without congenital heart disease. We measured SV with EC and echocardiography, within 10 min. Measurements were repeated 6 times by the same operator to calculate repeatability before and after echocardiography. Data have been compared with correlation and Bland-Altman analysis.

Results 59 neonates were enrolled, allowing 150 paired measurements. Mean gestational age and birth weight were 33.9 ± 3.4 wks and 1988 ± 823 g, respectively.

Results of Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis for the whole population were (r = 0.611; p < 0.001) and (mean error [echo-EC] -1.35 mL [95% CI: -6.55 mL ± 3.85 ml]), respectively.

Correlation is maintained even with PDA (r = 0.627; p < 0.001).

Gestational age seems to do not influence the correlation between EC and echo (Partial correlation coefficient r = 0.36; p < 0.0001).

Repeatability (coefficient of variation) was 46% for EC and 52% for echocardiography. There was no difference in SV measured by EC after 10 min (3.76 ± SD vs 3.78 ± SD; p = 0.56, Wilcoxon test).

Conclusions EC is feasible, reproducible and quick. It could be an useful tool for continuous monitoring and haemodynamic evaluation in neonates. EC is particularly interesting for the clinical management of preterm neonates.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.