Article Text

Download PDFPDF
G18 Management of clinically well children presenting to the Paediatric Emergency Department with a petechial rash
  1. E Abrahamson1,
  2. S Ioannidis2
  1. 1Department of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  2. 2Imperial School of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK


Background We performed a retrospective review of the management of clinically well children presenting to our PED with a petechial rash. Our management follows the NICE petechial pathway, however we feel that many children with a low risk of meningococcal sepsis receive intravenous (IV) antibiotics unnecessarily. In this study we used the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria to review the management of children with a petechial rash.

Methods We used SAP® Business Objects to search the hospital database for patients presenting with a petechial rash, September 2012–13. Cases were divided into those with or without evidence of SIRS (defined as core temperature <36oC or > 38.5oC, an elevated or depressed leukocyte count, tachypnoea and an abnormal heart rate). The management of the non-SIRS group was reviewed, including laboratory results, use of IV antibiotics and final outcome.

Results 69 cases of petechiae were identified, of which 55 (80%) did not meet the SIRS criteria. 22 (40%) of this group were given IV antibiotics of which 9 (41%) were admitted and 13 (59%) were ambulated. Of these, 18 were pyrexial, mean 38.5oC (range 37.5–40.2oC), 18 had a raised C-reactive protein (CRP), mean 32 mg/L (13–106 mg/L) and 6 had abnormal leukocyte counts, mean 14.9 × 109/L (2.5–20.6 × 109/L). There were no cases of proven sepsis. All 22 children had an uneventful recovery after a mean of 2 doses (1 to 3) of IV ceftriaxone. The remaining 14 children who had SIRS all received IV antibiotics but none had proven sepsis.

Conclusions In our study, 40% of children with a petechial rash but no evidence of SIRS received IV antibiotics. 59% were sent home with a line in-situ for ambulatory care, confirming the clinician view of a low risk of sepsis. No child proved to have sepsis. We believe the NICE petechiae pathway is over-cautious and we suggest that observation only is a valid strategy within a tight safety netting protocol. We recognise a larger scale study is needed to further assess our conclusion given the low prevalence yet significance of a case of meningococcal sepsis.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.