Article Text

Download PDFPDF
G89 Individual Risk Assessment Tool for Asthma Prediction at School Age in a UK Birth Cohort
  1. R Wang,
  2. A Custovic,
  3. A Simpson,
  4. D Belgrave,
  5. CS Murray
  1. Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK


Background Commonly used Asthma Predictive Index (API; Castro-Rodriguez 2000) has good negative but poor positive predictive value (PPV) which reduces its clinical usefulness. We aimed to develop, within a population-based cohort, an asthma risk prediction tool (ARPT) better suited for clinical use.

Method Children from a UK birth cohort attended follow-up at age 3, 8 and 11 years. Parents completed validated questionnaires. Children were skin prick tested (SPT) to common inhalant and food allergens. GP records were transcribed to collect information on physician-confirmed wheeze. An ARPT was developed using backwards logistic regression of data collected at age 3 years. We assessed its predictive performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Repeated internal validation was performed.

Results Of 829 children were included in the analysis, 132(17.8%) had asthma at school-age (year 8 or 11). The ARPT was found to include 4 predictors at age 3 years yielding a total score of 5: wheeze ever (1), wheeze causing shortness of breath (1), wheeze after exercise (2) and eczema (1). In the whole population, children with a score of >4 had a significantly increased risk of having asthma at school-age odds ratio [OR] 25.3, 95% CI [11.8–54.1], p < 0.0001; PPV 80%; sensitivity 28%). API, when applied to our cohort, yielded an OR for asthma at school-age of 7.4 (95% CI [4.5–12.2], p < 0.0001; PPV 54%; sensitivity 31%). We then applied our ARPT amongst children who presented to their GP with wheeze within the first 3 years of life; those with ARTP score of ≥4 had a significantly increased risk of asthma at school-age (OR 15.6, 95% CI [6.1–39.9] p < 0.0001; PPV 82%; sensitivity 35%). API, when applied in this population, had OR of 4.7 (95% CI [2.53–8.60], p < 0.0001; PPV 57%, Sensitivity 44%). Internal validation showed good agreement (AUCpredicting 0.78 vs. AUCobserved 0.77).

Conclusion APRT is a simple tool based mainly on clinical history which could easily be applied in primary/secondary care to risk stratify children with wheeze symptoms in early childhood and predict asthma by school-age with a good positive predictive value.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.