Statistics from Altmetric.com
Before. And after
In the world of non-randomised studies, there are bucketloads of variants, a common one that we see is the ‘before and after study’. This is, on the face of it, a sensible approach. Do your ‘thing’, then change stuff, do the ‘other thing’. Monitor something important you hope to change, and then if it does, you have some evidence of benefit.
Except for most before and after studies it’s not quite like that. They are rarely conducted prospectively, but usually because Something is going on—rising infection rates, loads of Kawasaki diagnoses, increasing ‘do not attend’ rates—and Something Must Be Done. So it is. And then the worrying thing falls back down …
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.