Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Fever in the returning child traveller: approach to diagnosis and management
  1. J Halbert1,
  2. D Shingadia2,
  3. Jane N Zuckerman3
  1. 1Department of Paediatrics, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, UK
  2. 2Department of Infectious Diseases, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
  3. 3Academic Centre For Travel Medicine & Vaccines, WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference, Research and Training in Travel Medicine, University College London Medical School, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jay Halbert, Department of Paediatrics, Lister Hospital, Coreys Mill Lane, Stevenage, Hertfordshire SG1 4AB, UK; J.Halbert{at}


During the last half century there has been an exponential increase in international travel including to more exotic and long-haul destinations. The assessment of febrile returning child travellers presents diagnostic challenges and is often performed poorly. A detailed travel and medical history, clinical examination and appropriate first-line investigations are essential. While the majority of children will have a common self-limiting or easily treatable infection, it is important to consider other causes, including imported infections, which may be life-threatening or highly contagious. In this article, we provide guidance on the initial assessment and management of such children with a focus on some of the more important imported infections, including malaria, dengue, typhoid fever, travellers’ diarrhoea, respiratory infections, tuberculosis, schistosomiasis and rickettsial diseases.

  • Accident & Emergency
  • General Paediatrics
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Tropical Inf Dis
  • Tropical Paediatrics

Statistics from


An exponential increase in international travel has resulted in growing numbers of children with fever following recent travel abroad.1 Such patients present diagnostic challenges and their overall assessment is often poorly performed.2 This article describes a systematic approach to their diagnostic work-up and management.

Initial assessment

The seriously ill child is managed immediately according to advanced paediatric life support (APLS) principles in consultation with an infectious disease specialist.

A comprehensive medical and travel history together with clinical examination are essential and should be undertaken as described below.

Destinations and dates of travel

A detailed history of all travel destinations including transit points within the previous 12 months (not just the most recent trip) enables consideration of infections more prevalent in or limited to certain geographic regions. The risk of exposure may vary from high to non-existent within the same country, from rural to urban areas and from lower to higher altitudes. Several resources are available that can provide guidance on the risk from infections in different regions of the world.3–6

Precise travel dates enable the exclusion of certain infections by virtue of their incubation periods.7 For instance, malaria may be excluded if symptoms occur <7 days after the first possible exposure. Similarly dengue can be excluded if the onset of symptoms occur >14 days after the last possible exposure.8

The season of travel may be important. For example, the risk from malaria is usually highest during the rainy season and from meningococcal disease in the meningitis belt of sub-Saharan Africa during the dry season. Prolonged travel is associated with an increased risk of exposure to infections.

Purpose of travel and activities

The proportion of children visiting friends and relatives (VFR) abroad has increased more than any other reason for travelling.1 They tend to be at increased risk from infections by virtue of living in closer proximity to the local population; consuming locally prepared foods and drinks; travelling for longer periods; and being less likely to take prophylactic precautions and seek pretravel and post-travel health advice.8 ,9

Certain activities undertaken while abroad are associated with specific infections.10 Freshwater recreational activities are associated with leptosporosis and schistosomiasis in certain regions. Children have an increased tendency to play with animals including dogs and monkeys predisposing them to zoonotic infections such as rabies.

Living conditions

Camping, budget accommodation and living in close proximity to the local population are associated with an increased risk of malaria, typhus and meningococcal disease.7

The risk of food and waterborne infections depends upon how hygienically food is prepared and consumed. Raw, undercooked and reheated food, as well as non-sterilised water, are associated with typhoid fever, travellers’ diarrhoea, viral hepatitis A and E and fascioliasis. Unpasteurised dairy products are associated with brucellosis, salmonellosis and listeriosis.


Dates of routine and travel-specific vaccination schedules, including boosters, are important to ascertain whether sufficient protection was provided prior to departure. While certain vaccines, such as hepatitis A and yellow fever provide almost complete protection, others such as typhoid fever are less effective (<70%).11

For travel to malaria endemic areas, details on whether malaria chemoprophylaxis was taken including supervision/compliance is important. While Atovaquone/proguanil should be taken daily until 7 days after the last potential exposure, mefloquine should be taken weekly until 4 weeks after the last potential exposure. The use of mosquito nets, long sleeved clothing and N,N-Diethyl-meta-toluamide, and whether the child sustained insect bites, are important when considering arthropod-borne infections.

Past medical, drug and family history

Current comorbidities and medications, especially those that are immunosuppressive, may predispose the child to infections. A child with splenic dysfunction, for example, sickle cell disease, is at increased risk of malaria and encapsulated organisms such as pneumococcus. Medical care received abroad may be inadequate. Incomplete courses of substandard antimalarials and antibiotics may lead to partially treated infections. Details of unwell travel contacts or companions may have diagnostic and public health implications.

History of presenting complaint

A complete systems review, including the date of onset and sequence that symptoms present, is important. Associated symptoms, such as a cough or abdominal pain, may help to localise the infection although symptoms may yet manifest in the acute presentation. The pattern and duration of fever may be important, however, the traditional tertian pattern in Plasmodium falciparum malaria is rarely seen in children. Many infections present with a non-specific fever and a variety of associated symptoms. Care must be taken particularly in the acute phase that associated symptoms do not lead to misdiagnosis through inappropriate localisation of the infection.


A complete physical examination is important to elicit signs associated with certain infections. This should include an assessment of the child’s weight and nutritional status. However, the absence of associated signs and symptoms does not necessarily exclude diagnoses. Skin rashes are often non-specific, but may be characteristic of specific infections or indicate potentially serious infection, such as the petechiae/purpura of meningoccocal disease and viral haemorrhagic fevers (VHF). Lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly and jaundice are each associated with a variety of infectious and non-infectious causes (table 1).

Table 1

Clinical presentation of selected paediatric infectious diseases


Table 2 lists first-line and second-line investigations to consider depending upon the travel history and clinical presentation. Investigations of particular importance to consider in returning child travellers include a malaria blood film, blood culture, stool culture and chest X-ray. Second-line investigations are usually considered after undertaking first-line investigations and in consultation with a microbiology/infectious disease specialist, but may be included with the initial investigations if there is a strong clinical suspicion.

Table 2


Thick and thin blood films for malaria diagnosis, speciation and parasite count are mandatory for all children who have travelled to a malaria region within the previous 12 months regardless of a presentation suggestive of alternative diagnoses. Malaria chemoprophylaxis is not 100% effective.

Initial investigations may provide supporting evidence of infections.12 For instance, thrombocytopenia, anaemia and hypoglycaemia are associated with malaria, while leucopoenia and thrombocytopenia are associated with dengue.

Eosinophilia is associated with invasive helminth infections, such as schistosomiasis, fascioliasis and echinococcosis. Filarial tropical pulmonary eosinophilia and Loeffler’s syndrome should be considered if there is associated cough and wheeze. Other causes include fungal infections such as coccidioidomycosis and non-infective causes, such as asthma and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Guidelines for the management of eosinophilia are available from the British Infection Society.13

Local microbiologists can provide guidance on appropriate initial investigations (including how and when samples should be taken) and infection control. For instance, dengue IgM serology does not become positive until after the fourth day of illness.

Regional paediatric infectious disease and public health specialists may be consulted for advice on seriously unwell children, specific infections, second-line investigations, interpretation of results, empirical therapy and infection control. They are usually contacted after consultation with local microbiologists and undertaking first-line investigations. They may recommend specific panels of serological/PCR tests based upon the travel history and presentation. Specialist laboratory services may be available through such regional centres or Public Health England.14

Differential diagnosis

The majority of febrile returning child travellers will have a mild self-limiting or easily treatable cosmopolitan infection. These are infections that are relatively common and can occur worldwide, such as respiratory or urinary tract infections (Case 1).8 ,15 ,16 Leptosporosis, mononucleosis and travellers’ diarrhoea are other important causes worldwide.8 ,18–23

Depending on the travel history, it is also vital to consider tropical and geographically localised infections including disease outbreaks since some may be life-threatening and highly contagious. Malaria is one of the commonest and most important causes of imported fever in children. After travel to sub-Saharan Africa, other important causes to consider include: schistosomiasis, amoebiasis, rickettsioses, meningococcal disease and VHF. After travel to Asia, important causes include: dengue, typhoid fever, chikungunya and emerging viral infections such as avian influenza. Brucellosis should be considered after travel to the Middle East and dengue and coccidioidomycosis after travel to South America and the Caribbean. Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF), Q-fever and tick-borne encephalitis are examples of infections rare in the UK but endemic in North America, Australia and mainland Europe, respectively.8 ,18–23

Non-infectious causes of fever include Kawasaki disease, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, SLE, leukaemia and lymphoma. Some, such as haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis may be triggered by minor illnesses sustained during travel.

The clinician must decide which of these causes are more probable based upon the travel history, risk factors, clinical presentation, incubation periods and investigation results.


In the UK each year, there are 1500–2000 cases of malaria with 10–20 deaths; 15–20% of cases occur in children.24–27 The majority are due to Plasmodium falciparum which tends to present within 2 months; other malaria species may present months or years after exposure. Malaria often presents with non-specific signs and symptoms including flu-like symptoms, malaise, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, abdominal pain, cough, jaundice, pallor and hepatosplenomegaly (Case 2). Headache, myalgia and rigors are less common in children.25 Young children are particularly susceptible to severe malaria including anaemia and cerebral malaria (box).25 ,27–29


Severe malaria29

Impaired consciousness or seizures

Inability to sit, stand or feed

Respiratory distress or pulmonary oedema

Spontaneous bleeding

Jaundice with vital organ dysfunction

Circulatory shock

Severe anaemia (<7 g/dL)

Hypoglycaemia (<2.2 mmol/L)

Hyperparasitaemia (>2%/100 000/μL)

Metabolic acidosis (plasma pH < 7.3, bicarbonate <15 mmol/L, or lactate >5 mmol/L)

Disseminated intravascular coagulation

Renal/hepatic impairment, oliguiria or haemoglobinuria

Dengue and chikungunya

Dengue fever is a viral illness transmitted by the day-time biting Aedes aegypti mosquito in the tropics and subtropics. It is a relatively common and usually mild self-limiting infection in travellers returning especially from Asia and South America.8 In 2010 in the UK, there were 27 cases in children and teenagers.30 Chikungunya may occur after travel to Africa, Asia and the Indian Ocean islands. The symptoms of dengue are non-specific. In children, epistaxis, hepatomegaly and oliguria are more common.31 In older children and adults, headache, retro-orbital pain, arthralgia, petechiae and malaena are more common.31 Other symptoms may include diarrhoea, nausea, abdominal pain, cough and lymphadenopathy. Severe dengue and complications, such as encephalopathy, are rare in travellers. Children with a previous history of dengue infection are at increased risk of severe dengue. Dengue shock syndrome is more common than dengue haemorrhagic fever in children with severe dengue.31 Chikungunya has a similar presentation to dengue fever but typically with a more chronic polyarthralgia.

Typhoid fever

Enteric fever is prevalent in conditions of poor sanitation worldwide and is particularly common in children VFRs in the Asian subcontinent. In sub-Saharan Africa, non-typhoidal salmonellae are more prevalent. Young children may present with a non-specific febrile illness. Older children with enteric fever may develop the classical features of headache, cough, diarrhoea, constipation, abdominal pain, transient truncal rose spots, hepatosplenomegaly and a relative bradycardia (Case 3).32

Travellers’ diarrhoea

The majority of travellers’ diarrhoea is self-limiting. However, fever is more common in children and there is an increased risk of bacterial infection.33 ,34 Parasitic infections, such as giardiasis, and non-infectious causes, such as inflammatory bowel disease, should be considered especially in prolonged diarrhoea >14 days.33 ,34 Amoebiasis may present with dysentery and/or a liver abscess with hepatomegaly and abdominal pain. Systemic infections, such as malaria and typhoid fever, should also be considered.8

Respiratory infections

Respiratory infections are a common cause of fever in travellers. Respiratory symptoms may be caused by common respiratory infections, such as influenza or streptococcus pneumoniae; atypical pneumonias; or non-respiratory tract infections, such as malaria and Loeffler’s syndrome.


Tuberculosis typically affects the lungs, although disseminated and extrapulmonary disease is more common in young children. It should be suspected in returning child travellers presenting with a chronic cough (>3 weeks), night sweats, weight loss, lymphadenopathy or pyrexia of unknown origin, particularly in VFRs after prolonged travel to high-risk regions (tuberculosis incidence >40/100 000), or close contact with individuals with suspected/confirmed active pulmonary tuberculosis. Drug-resistant tuberculosis is becoming an increasing problem in certain parts of the world.


Acute schistosomiasis (Katayama’s fever) should be considered in a child with fever, urticarial rash, eosinophilia and a history of freshwater exposure in endemic regions of predominantly sub-Saharan Africa, as well as Southeast Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean. Diagnosis is challenging with initial serology, and stool/urine for ova frequently negative. Specific gastrointestinal and urological symptoms usually present later.


Rickettsial diseases are transmitted worldwide by fleas, lice, ticks and mites, and are becoming increasingly recognised in travellers. Diagnosis is mainly clinical, with potential symptoms including headache, malaise, myalgia, rash (eschar, maculopapular, petechiae), lymphadenitis and photophobia. African tick bite fever should be considered after safari in sub-Saharan Africa. Mediterranean spotted fever (MSF) may occur after travel to countries adjacent to the Mediterranean Sea, Black Sea, sub-Saharan Africa or India. RMSF occurs in parts of the Americas including the USA. MSF and RMSF can be severe with multiple organ involvement if untreated.


The seriously ill child is managed according to APLS principles and often with empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics. National guidelines exist for the management of several imported infections including malaria and tuberculosis.25 ,29 ,35 Other resources, such as ‘The Blue Book’ provide guidance on the management of a variety of paediatric infections.36

Therapy should be guided by local geographical patterns of antimicrobial resistance and culture results once available. For example, ceftriaxone or azithromycin is recommended for typhoid fever in child travellers to Asia due to widespread fluroquinolone resistance.37

Uncomplicated malaria is treated with oral antimalarials, and children with falciparum malaria should be admitted for at least 24 h observation.27 Severe malaria is treated with intravenous artesunate or quinine, and such children should be admitted to a paediatric intensive care or high-dependency unit.25 ,27 ,29

The management of infections, such as dengue fever and travellers’ diarrhoea, is usually supportive. However, severe dengue should be managed in intensive care and profuse diarrhoea can lead to rapid dehydration especially in younger children. Clinicians should have a lower threshold for commencing empirical antibiotics, such as azithromycin, for moderate and severe travellers’ diarrhoea including dysentery.33 ,34

Infection control and public health

Febrile returning child travellers should initially be managed in a side room with staff using universal precautions if there are respiratory or haemorrhagic symptoms. Specific suspected/confirmed infections may then require more or less intensive infection control measures. Laboratory personnel should be informed of certain suspected infections, such as typhoid fever.

VHF are endemic in parts of Africa, Asia, South America and Eastern Europe. Some are classified as Hazard Group 4 by virtue of their high mortality, diagnostic difficulty, absence of effective treatments and high contagiousness.38 Such VHF are extremely rare but may be considered in febrile children returning from an endemic region within 21 days particularly if they have bleeding, bruising or a negative malaria film.38 Confirmed cases are usually managed in a High Security Infectious Disease Unit.

Public Health England publishes a list of imported infections with a statutory requirement to notify the local Consultant in Communicable Disease Control. They may also recommend prophylaxis for close contacts and assist with contact tracing.39


A comprehensive assessment of the febrile returning child traveller includes a detailed travel history which will guide first-line investigations and initial management. The majority of children will have a mild self-limiting cosmopolitan infection. However it is vital to consider rare but potentially serious imported infections. Blood films are mandatory for children with travel to a malaria region. Guidance is available from a variety of online resources, guidelines, local microbiologists, regional paediatric infectious disease specialists and the new Public Health England Imported Fever Service.

Case 1: John was 15 years old when he presented to the emergency department with a 2-day history of fever, coryza and reduced appetite. He had returned the previous day from a 3-week school rugby trip to Australia. He denied any risk-associated activities including sexual contact, tattooing, camping and water-sports. He had no comorbidities and received no medical/dental treatment during travel. Apart from travel to Sydney and Melbourne he had a brief transit in Singapore. Examination revealed coryza and a fever of 38.2 °C but was otherwise unremarkable. John and his mother were reassured that a viral upper respiratory tract infection was the most likely diagnosis secondary to his recent long-haul flight and were provided with advice when to return should he deteriorate. A nasopharyngeal aspirate confirmed a diagnosis of influenza.

Comment: Cosmopolitan infections are the leading cause of fever in returning child travellers including to tropical regions.8 ,15–18 They may be more common in travellers due to increased contact with others during travel. In particular, outbreaks of influenza and gastroenteritis have occurred on aeroplanes and cruise ships.7 Specific risk-taking behaviours associated with adolescents including sexual activity should be discussed.

Case 2: Laura was 4 years old when she presented to her general practitioner (GP) 8 days after returning from visiting her family in Nigeria. She had a 2-day history of fever, diarrhoea and cough. Her GP considered that a viral upper respiratory tract infection was the most likely diagnosis and arranged to see Laura again in 2 days. The following day Laura presented to the emergency department drowsy with Kussmaul breathing, tachycardia, hypotension, pallor, a fever of 39.1 °C and hypoglycaemia. She was commenced on oxygen, intravenous ceftriaxone and fluid resuscitated. Her malaria film confirmed falciparum malaria (5% parasitaemia) for which intravenous quinine was administered. Her haemoglobin was 5.2 g/dL, and so a blood transfusion was commenced. A chest X-ray showed pulmonary oedema. Laura was intubated, ventilated and transferred to paediatric intensive care. Her parasitaemia cleared within 24 h and she was extubated after 48 h making a full recovery.

Comment: Delay and misdiagnoses are significant causes of morbidity and mortality in malaria. Blood films must be analysed urgently and repeatedly as false negatives may occur due to haematology inexperience in parasite recognition and low parasitaemia. Three films should be performed 12–24 h apart if clinical suspicion remains to exclude malaria. Laura had severe malaria which is managed with intravenous antimalarials (artesunate or quinine) in an intensive care or high-dependency unit.25 ,27–29 In the UK, the majority of cases are children VFRs in sub-Saharan Africa. Malaria is a notifiable disease.29

Case 3: Anita was 7 years old when she presented to the emergency department with a 5-day history of fever, headache and diarrhoea. She had returned 4 days previously from visiting her family in Calcutta for Christmas. Her routine vaccinations were up to date, but she had not received any travel-specific vaccines or malaria chemoprophylaxis. On examination, Anita had a fever of 38.8 °C. Her repeat malaria films were negative, full blood count normal and her biochemistry showed a C-reactive protein of 55 mg/L. She was commenced on empirical intravenous ceftriaxone. Her initial stool culture was negative but her blood culture and repeat stool culture both confirmed salmonella typhi sensitive to ceftriaxone. The consultant in Communicable Disease Control (CCDC) was notified. Anita completed a course of ceftriaxone and was discharged home with resolution of her symptoms.

Comment: The majority of enteric fever cases in the UK are in returned travellers. In 2011, nearly a quarter of the 493 cases were in children.40 Current vaccines provide incomplete protection against typhoid fever and no protection against paratyphoid fever.8 ,32 Potential complications after the second week include gastrointestinal haemorrhage and perforation, septicaemia and encephalitis. Although bone marrow culture has the highest sensitivity, diagnosis is usually made from blood culture during the first week or stool and urine culture after the first week. PCR may be a useful adjunct. Currently, serology testing, including the Widal test, is unreliable and not recommended. The CCDC may arrange follow-up stool sampling to ensure children are not chronic carriers.



  • Contributors JH, DS and JNZ were all involved in the conception and design of this review article. JH wrote the initial draft manuscript. DS and JNZ contributed to the subsequent drafts and all three authors revised the final draft.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Atoms
    R Mark Beattie