Article Text

Download PDFPDF
How to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation: an opportunity for technology development
  1. Ian Maconochie1,
  2. Robert Bingham2
  1. 1Department of St Mary's Paediatric ED, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, London, UK
  2. 2Department of Anaesthesia, Great Ormond Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Ian Maconochie, St Mary's Paediatric ED, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, London W2 1NY, UK; ian.maconochie{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The report by Martin et al1 describing the accuracy of resuscitation interventions by Advanced Paediatric Life Support instructors raises some interesting questions, not least for the writers of resuscitation guidelines.

The most obvious question is: Does it really matter that external chest compressions (ECCs) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are performed slightly too fast, not deep enough or in the wrong ratio? From the perspective of the guideline writer, the answer is complex. For example, there is very good evidence that CPR performed by bystanders improves survival in infants and children, but there is no direct evidence in humans that strict compliance with the international recommendations on ECC rate, depth, duty cycle (the ratio between compression and relaxation) and relaxation force will achieve improved patient outcomes during resuscitation.2 Indeed, it would be impossible to design an ethical study to prove this. There is, however, evidence from laboratory animal studies, and some human observations, that inform best methods of optimising pressure and flow during ECC and it is a reasonable assumption that better perfusion should create the potential for improved outcomes.3 Hence, the guideline writer has the difficult task of translating such research evidence into a number or, as in this case,1 a small range of numbers for the interventions during ECC. If a resuscitation provider performs ECC outside these ranges, there will be no sudden failure of blood flow—it is likely the ratio of blood flow to, say, …

View Full Text


  • Contributors Both authors contributed to this paper.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles