You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Miscellanea
Archivist
Microarray versus karyotyping for antenatal diagnosis and after stillbirth

https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-303660

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Successive papers in a single issue of the New England Journal of Medicine have reported on the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis and diagnosis after stillbirth (Ronal J Wapner and colleagues. N Engl J Med 2012;367:2175–84; Uma M Reddy and colleagues. Ibid: 2185–93; see also editorial, ibid: 2249–51).

    The study on prenatal diagnosis included chorionic villus or amniotic fluid samples from 4406 women at 29 US centres. Samples for microarray analysis were available from 4391 women but 109 samples …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.