Article Text
Is ultrasonography required to rule out congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tract in babies with isolated preauricular tags or sinuses?
Statistics from Altmetric.com
- Kidney/abnormalities
- Kidney/ultrasonography
- Urinary Tract/abnormalities
- Urinary Tract/ultrasonography
- Ear/abnormalities
Scenario
While performing an examination of a newborn, you note a preauricular sinus (PAS). The examination is otherwise unremarkable. A colleague suggests a need for renal ultrasonography in infants with a PAS or preauricular tag (PAT), but your consultant tells you this is unjustified. You decide to search for evidence to inform your clinical decision.
Structured clinical question
Do infants with isolated PAT or PAS (population) have a higher incidence of congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tract (CAKUT) (outcome) on ultrasound (intervention) than infants without (controls)?
Search strategy and outcome
Secondary sources
Cochrane Library (21 August 2012)—preauricular OR ‘pre-auricular’—16 results of which none were relevant.
Primary sources
Pubmed (21 August 2012)—(‘pre-auricular’ OR preauricular OR ‘Ear/abnormalities’(MeSH)) AND (kidney OR renal OR urinary OR genitourinary OR ‘Kidney/abnormalities’(MeSH) OR ‘Kidney/ultrasonography’(MeSH) OR ‘Urinary Tract/abnormalities’(MeSH) OR ‘Urinary Tract/ultrasonography’(MeSH)).
Five hundred and forty-two articles were found. Titles and/or abstracts were reviewed to identify …
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.