Article Text


1484 Accuracy of a Sequential Approach to Identify Young Febrile Infants at Low Risk for Invasive Bacterial Infection
  1. S Mintegi1,2,
  2. S Bressan3,
  3. B Gomez1,
  4. L Da Dalt4,
  5. I Olaciregui5,
  6. M De La Torre6,
  7. M Palacios7,
  8. P Berlese4,
  9. A Ruano8,
  10. J Benito1
  1. 1Pediatric Emergency, Cruces University Hospital
  2. 2Department of Pediatrics, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao
  3. 3Department of Pediatrics, University of Padova, Padova, Spain
  4. 4Ospedale Ca’Foncello, Department of Pediatrics, Treviso, Italy
  5. 5Pediatric Emergency, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia
  6. 6Pediatric Emergency, Niño Jesús University Hospital, Madrid
  7. 7Pediatric Emergency, Navarra University Complex, Pamplona
  8. 8Pediatric Emergency, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain


Introduction Nowadays it is possible to manage as outpatients selected young febrile infants with low risk criteria for serious bacterial infection. A sequential approach, evaluating, firstly, the appearance of the infant, secondly, the urinanalysis, and, finally, the results of the blood biomarkers, including procalcitonin, may identify better low risk febrile infants suitable for outpatient management.

Objective To assess the value of a sequential approach (“step by step”) to febrile young infants in order to identify low risk patients suitable for outpatient management and compare it with other ones previously described (Rochester criteria and Lab-score).

Methods A retrospective comparison of three different approaches (“step by step”, Lab-score and Rochester criteria) was made in 1123 febrile infants less than 3 months of age attended in seven European Pediatric Emergency Departments.

Results Of the 1123 infants (Invasive Bacterial Infection - IBI-, 48; 4.2%), 488 (43.4%) were classified as low risk criteria for IBI according to the “step by step” approach (vs 693–61.7%- with the Labscore and 458–40.7%- with the Rochester criteria). The prevalence of IBI in the low-risk criteria patients was 0.2% (95% CI 0–0.6%) using the “step by step” approach (vs 0.7%–95% CI 0.1–1.3% with the Labscore and 1.1%–95% CI 0.1–2%- with Rochester). Using the “step by step” approach, 1 patient with IBI was not correctly classified (2.0%, CI95% 0–6.12) vs 5 using the Labscore or Rochester (10.4%, CI95% 1.76–19.04%).

Conclusions A sequential approach to young febrile infants including procalcitonin identifies better patients more suitable for outpatient management.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.