Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Changes in primary care prescribing patterns for paediatric asthma: a prescribing database analysis
  1. Hajer Elkout1,
  2. Peter J Helms1,
  3. Colin R Simpson2,3,
  4. James S McLay1
  1. 1Department of Child Health, Division of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
  2. 2Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
  3. 3Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  1. Correspondence to James S McLay, Department of Child Health, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Royal Aberdeen Children's Hospital, Westburn Road, Aberdeen AB25 2ZG, UK; j.mclay{at}abdn.ac.uk

Abstract

Background Little is known about the impact of British asthma management guideline revisions. Concerns about the use of high dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in children have resulted in the promotion of add-on therapy.

Aims To assess prescribing patterns of asthma medication in children in the primary care setting.

Methods Retrospective observational study of asthma prescribing in children aged 0-18 years using primary care database from 2001 to 2006.

Results The proportion of children prescribed oral corticosteroids increased significantly (from 6% in 2001-2002 to 16% in 2005-2006, p<0.001), while the proportion of children prescribed an ICS dose of >400 mcg decreased from 16.2% to 11.7% (P<0.001). The proportion of children prescribed an add-on therapy and an ICS dose >400 µg, increased from 38.8 % in 2001-2002 to 61.2% in 2005-2006 (p<0.001).

Conclusions Although adherence with asthma management guidelines is not optimal, this study has identified improved adherence in primary care.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.