Responses

Download PDFPDF
Question 1 Is there an increased risk of necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants whose mothers' expressed breast milk is fortified with multicomponent fortifier?
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Reply to "This question deserves a more indepth review"
    • Iain Martin
    • Other Contributors:
      • David Quine, Lesley Jackson

    Dear Archimedes,

    We thank Dr Gallagher for his interesting contribution, and welcome further debate on this topic.

    While we agree that in the study from Schanler et al. fortifier is used in all infants when on >100ml/kg/day of milk, one can draw the conclusion that early fortification does not change the risk of NEC. The use of fortifier above 100 ml/kg/day, however, may attenuate the overall effe...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    This question deserves a more indepth review

    Dear Archimedes, This is a very important question and one that deserves more consideration. Many health care staff looking after these vulnerable infants do recognise that some of them seem to develop poor feed tolerance after addition of fortifier. The papers used to support the conclusion that fortification does not appear to increase the risk of NEC deserve a rereading by the authors. The paper by Schanler et al is p...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.