Aims Locally, children with severe neurodisability who are at risk of life threatening events have a personal resuscitation plan (PRP). The authors have previously presented the development and implementation of PRPs,1 and the views of health professionals on their usefulness,2 to the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health meetings. This report is of a service evaluation of the PRP system from the parent's perspective.
Methods A questionnaire was either posted to or completed by telephone with the parents of surviving children with a PRP, identified from a central audit file.
Results 10/17 parents completed a questionnaire. Five parents had found it easy to make a PRP with their child's consultant; five had found it difficult. All parents would recommend having a PRP to other families. No parents wanted to change the PRP format. Two parents reported that the PRP had helped in an emergency. Comments included: “It's important to plan for the future, good to discuss our views, have detailed information, choose the best plan.” “It gives us more control, avoids misunderstandings.” “He will get the right care straight away.”
Conclusion Although it is upsetting, parents want to discuss what will happen if their child has a life threatening event. They want to understand the options and be involved in making a plan for best care. The current PRP format is acceptable. Having these decisions documented is empowering for families and gives peace of mind.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.