Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Non-specific effects of vaccines: in context
  1. Paul Fine1,
  2. David Elliman2
  1. 1London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  2. 2Great Ormond Hospital for Children, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Paul Fine, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; paul.fine{at}lshtm.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Frank Shann argues that the basic expanded programme on immunisation (EPI) schedule (Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) at birth, diphtheria, pertusis, tetanus (DPT)–oral polio vaccine at 6, 10 and 14 weeks, measles at 9 months) may not be optimal under certain circumstances. He suggests that some of these vaccines may be associated with timing-related ‘non-specific effects’ on the immune system which influence mortality attributable to conditions other than the specific targets of the vaccines.1 He reviews evidence that BCG and measles vaccines may have non-specific beneficial effects, and on the other hand, DPT might, under certain unusual circumstances (high background infectious disease risks but low pertussis risk) appear to have detrimental effects on all cause mortality. This complex subject needs to be considered in its proper context.

This article is part of a long and complex story. …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.