Download PDFPDF
Opportunistic growth measurements are not frequently done in hospital
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Children's growth: measured but rarely plotted
    • Louisa Pollock, Specialty Registrar Paediatrics
    • Other Contributors:
      • Paul Higgins, and Adrienne Sullivan

    Lek and Hughes(1) recently highlighted concerns that opportunities for growth measurement in children attending hospital are frequently missed. This has important implications for the current UK policy for growth monitoring, which encourages opportunistic measurement. It also has important implications for clinical practice –growth faltering may result from any chronic illness or may be the only marker of abuse or neglect...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Patients are weighed but not plotted

    Most patients presenting to a paediatric department for acute care will be weighed as part of the nursing assessment especially because weights are important for drug and fluid prescriptions. Junior doctors however generally fail to take the next step in this opportunistic contact to plot these weights. Unless clinically indicated e.g. as part of body surface area for drug prescriptions, the height is often not measured,...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Assessment of growth

    The paper by Lek and Hughes highlights a serious deficiency in the assessment of children admitted to their hospital and there is no reason to think that their findings are atypical. However, there are two important issues arising from their work.

    First, the authors failed to define good practice. Is it realistic to expect specialist surgeons to measure a child’s height and weight in their outpatient consul...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.