Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Otitis media with effusion: the long and winding road?
  1. Ian Williamson,
  2. Paul Little
  1. Community Clinical Science Division, Medical Faculty, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  1. Ian Williamson, University of Southampton, Community Clinical Science Division, Medical Faculty, Aldermoor Close, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK; igw{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Otitis media with effusion (OME) or glue ear has increased as a diagnosis in primary care over the past decade while grommet rates have declined. When developmental concerns are raised by parents or the child is noted to have frequent ear related problems, this often leads to referral and request for further expert assessment. Referral rates show more variability than for other ENT conditions such as tonsillectomy, and may partly relate to the present relative lack of accurate structured assessments in primary care.

Selection of appropriate children for referral and treatment remains a clinical priority with markers of severity and persistence being highly relevant but having some scope for improved utility. Whereas previously early intervention to prevent disability developing was part of the underlying philosophy of treatment, current interpretation of existing evidence is challenging this by highlighting the clinical heterogeneity in surgical trials, with potential for differential treatment effects.

The trials reported in Cochrane excluded many “syndrome” children who usually receive grommets, and also those with speech, …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests: None declared.