Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Positive impact of increased number of emergency consultants
  1. Gary C Geelhoed1,
  2. Elizabeth A Geelhoed2
  1. 1
    School of Primary, Aboriginal and Rural Health Care and School of Paediatrics and Child Health, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, PO Box D184, Perth, Western Australia, Australia 6840
  2. 2
    Health Economics and Policy, School of Population Health, M431, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia 6009
  1. Gary C Geelhoed, Emergency Services, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, PO Box D184, Perth, Western Australia, Australia 6840; Gary.Geelhoed{at}health.wa.gov.au

Abstract

The increased presence of consultant staff should theoretically lead to better outcomes in emergency departments (EDs). A retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary paediatric emergency department (PED) over a 10-year period documenting trends in percentage of children admitted, complaints to the department and average waiting times. Consultant numbers increased from 2.6 to 6.2 full time equivalent staff between 2000 and 2004. Other staffing numbers were essentially unchanged. All parameters examined improved coincident with increasing consultant numbers. The percentage of children admitted decreased by 27%, complaints fell by 41% and the average waiting time by 15%. The yearly cost of an additional 3.6 consultants (2005) was $A1 003 490 with net saving to the hospital of over $A9.48 million. The provision of additional consultant medical staff in a PED coincided with a decrease in the percentage of children admitted, complaints to the department and average waiting times, and was cost effective.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Funding: None.

  • Competing interests: None.