Download PDFPDF

High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in newborn infants of high-risk mothers
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    A possible re-emergence of osteomalacia in women and severe hypovitaminosis D in new-born in France
    • Anne-Marie SCHOTT, MD, PhD in Epidemiology
    • Other Contributors:
      • Sonia Belaid, and Marie-France Legoaziou

    Dear Editor,

    We found the article of S H Dijkstra et al (1) very interesting. We recently conducted a study in 93 non-pregnant women, aged 20 to 50 years, to determine the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in women at risk of vitamin D deficiency because of their wearing of concealing clothes (such as a veil). This prospective study was performed between December 2004 and January 2005 in general practitioner se...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.